Liam Draxl vs Gustavo Heide — Noumea CH Round of 32

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Liam Draxl
CAN2
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
BRA
Gustavo Heide
#136ATP
1695ELO
1536Hard ELO
$167kYTD
$609kCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Draxl L.
7-6 3-6 6-3
Heide G.
Draxl L.
77362
Heide G.
65631

Liam Draxl defeated Gustavo Heide 7-6 3-6 6-3 in the Noumea CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Liam Draxl came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Liam Draxl extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Liam Draxl closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-06Davis Cup QLS R1: BRA vs CANRRhardLiam Draxl6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Heide G.

Heide G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Serve advantage — Heide G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Heide G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.4
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
5.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draxl L.Heide G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
90
Break points won·Dominant
36
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
63
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Heide G.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 49 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
5.8+29 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1536
4.6Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1695
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
9.06-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Heide G.
Freshness·Dominant
98
72

Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Heide G.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gea A.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-34-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[5]
Ellis B.
6-46-756-3
Gea A.
Zheng M.[6]
4-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Ellis B.
Tomic B.[8]
7-643-66-4
Rodionov J.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Zheng M.[6]
Tabur C.
3-66-46-2
Gea A.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Tomic B.[8]
Watt J.
6-43-64-1
Zheng M.[6]
Added D.
6-26-1
Tabur C.
Droguet T.[3]
6-746-46-4
Draxl L.[2]
Bouzige M.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Ilagan A.
7-657-64
Gea A.
Diaz Acosta F.
7-656-3
R32
Thompson J.[1]
Hudd E.
6-37-65
Added D.
Sinclair C.
6-36-746-2
Tabur C.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-66-16-4
Droguet T.[3]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Gea A.
Barrena A.[7]
6-46-0
Bouzige M.
Peniston R.
4-67-696-4
Draxl L.[2]
Heide G.
7-653-66-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Bernet H.
6-43-66-0
Ellis B.
Herbert P.[4]
7-54-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chazal M.
6-47-66
Langmo C.
Ogura K.
6-46-4
Tomic B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Dussin L.
6-26-3
Ilagan A.
Delaney J.
6-46-757-66
Watt J.
Vithoontien L.
7-656-1
Zheng M.[6]
Jasika O.
6-46-2