Clement Chidekh vs Charles Broom — Nottingham CH Quarter-final

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA2
Clement Chidekh
#205ATP
1513ELO
1412Grass ELO
$92kYTD
$401kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
grass
GBR
Charles Broom
#285ATP
1409ELO
1386Grass ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLW
Chidekh C.
6-3 6-2
Broom C.
Chidekh C.
662
Broom C.
320

Clement Chidekh defeated Charles Broom 6-3 6-2 in the Nottingham CH quarter-final on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chidekh C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Chidekh C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chidekh C.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.6
8.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (34 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chidekh C.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
12
Break points saved·Dominant
83
56
Break points won·Slight edge
9
0
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
42
Tiebreaks·Even
12
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chidekh C.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Broom C.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.8+26 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Grass Elo 1386
6.7Overall Elo 1513
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1409
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
1.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Chidekh C.Broom C.
Freshness·
65
—

Chidekh C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 84 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.[2]
Monday J.[1]
5-76-27-65
Semi-finals
Monday J.[1]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Samuel T.[3]
6-35-76-3
Quarter-finals
Kukushkin M.
Kingsley C.
6-27-5
Samuel T.[3]
Kozlov S.[7]
7-616-4
Chidekh C.[2]
Broom C.
6-36-2
Monday J.[1]
Gentzsch T.[8]
6-16-3
R16
Monday J.[1]
Hussey G.
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.[8]
Krumich M.
4-66-37-63
Kukushkin M.
Negritu C.
6-26-1
Kingsley C.
Gray A.[6]
6-44-66-1
Kozlov S.[7]
Erhard M.
6-26-4
Broom C.
Ritschard A.
6-46-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Samuel T.[3]
Broady L.
6-36-3
R32
Hussey G.
Guerrieri A.
6-46-4
Monday J.[1]
Maxted L.
4-67-656-4
Krumich M.
Kopp S.
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.[8]
Brunold M.
6-796-46-4
Negritu C.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
6-41-67-5
Kukushkin M.
Malige M.
6-36-0
Kingsley C.
Searle H.
6-46-1
Gray A.[6]
Gombos N.
6-13-66-1
Kozlov S.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-1
Erhard M.
Strombachs R.
7-653-67-65
Broady L.
Masur D.
6-34-66-3
Samuel T.[3]
Overbeck C.
6-26-4
Ritschard A.
Pereira T.[5]
7-656-1
Broom C.
Wendelken H.
7-56-3
Jubb P.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-737-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Matusevich A.
6-736-46-0