Dane Sweeny vs Philip Sekulic — Playford CH Quarter-final

Playford CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS7
Dane Sweeny
#127ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
hard
AUS
Philip Sekulic
#322ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Sweeny D.
6-2 6-4
Sekulic P.
Sweeny D.
662
Sekulic P.
240

Dane Sweeny defeated Philip Sekulic 6-2 6-4 in the Playford CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #127, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sweeny D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Sekulic P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sweeny D.Sekulic P.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sweeny D.Sekulic P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
45
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
79
Break points won·Even
11
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
68
45
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sweeny D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Sekulic P.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+80 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Hard Elo 1363
7.4Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1390
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.8
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
7.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sweeny D.Sekulic P.
Freshness·Slight edge
96
90

Sweeny D.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sekulic P.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hijikata R.[2]
Sweeny D.[7]
6-06-786-4
Semi-finals
Hijikata R.[2]
Bolt A.[4]
6-36-3
Sweeny D.[7]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-665-77-65
Quarter-finals
Hijikata R.[2]
Mccabe J.[6]
7-626-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Noguchi R.[8]
7-656-2
Sweeny D.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-26-4
Bolt A.[4]
Overbeck C.
7-656-4
R16
Overbeck C.
Kubler J.[5]
6-33-1
Sekulic P.
Tomic B.[3]
3-67-646-4
Sweeny D.[7]
Shiraishi H.
6-26-4
Bolt A.[4]
Marinkov P.
6-37-5
Mccabe J.[6]
Polmans M.
6-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Singh K.
6-46-1
Noguchi R.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Hijikata R.[2]
Sach T.
6-36-2
R32
Marinkov P.
Ellis B.
2-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Imamura M.
6-36-2
Singh K.
Isomura K.
5-76-46-3
Noguchi R.[8]
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Tomic B.[3]
Gengel M.
6-26-3
Sekulic P.
Hewitt C.
7-56-2
Shiraishi H.
Matsuda R.
6-43-67-5
Sweeny D.[7]
Bass F.
3-66-16-3
Kubler J.[5]
Tu L.
6-36-3
Bolt A.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-46-2
Polmans M.
Matsuoka H.
4-66-46-1
Sach T.
Wu T.
7-53-66-2
Hijikata R.[2]
Kumasaka T.
6-26-0
Moriya H.
Langmo C.
6-46-3
Overbeck C.
Dellavedova M.
3-67-56-2
Mccabe J.[6]
Bicknell B.
6-46-1