Toby Samuel vs Semen Pankin — Manama 2 CH Round of 16

Manama 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBR
Toby Samuel
#123ATP
1745ELO
1729Hard ELO
$175kYTD
$290kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
hard
RUS
Semen Pankin
#436ATP
26 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWW
Samuel T.
6-2 6-1
Pankin S.
Samuel T.
662
Pankin S.
210

Toby Samuel defeated Semen Pankin 6-2 6-1 in the Manama 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Toby Samuel came in ranked #123.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Samuel T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Pankin S.

Pankin S.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Samuel T.

Serve advantage — Samuel T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Samuel T.Pankin S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
56%
55%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
66%
68%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Samuel T.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pankin S.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 182 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Samuel T.Pankin S.
Freshness·
92
—

Samuel T.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Samuel T.
Simakin I.[2]
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Samuel T.
Bobichon M.
6-36-2
Simakin I.[2]
Brunclik P.[6]
1-67-646-3
Quarter-finals
Simakin I.[2]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-33-66-1
Bobichon M.
Ritschard A.
2-66-46-2
Brunclik P.[6]
Basic M.
6-16-3
Samuel T.
Fomin S.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Fomin S.[8]
Homberg M.
6-07-64
Bobichon M.
Zakaryia F.
6-36-2
Ritschard A.
Kellovsky D.
3-66-17-65
Brunclik P.[6]
Xilas I.
6-26-1
Marrero Curbelo I.
Melnic V.
3-67-666-1
Samuel T.
Pankin S.
6-26-1
Basic M.
Erhard M.[4]
6-46-3
Simakin I.[2]
Vasa E.
6-46-1
R32
Samuel T.
Sinclair C.
6-36-0
Pankin S.
Pieczkowski O.
6-47-65
Homberg M.
Ouakaa A.
6-27-5
Ritschard A.
Albot R.
6-36-2
Kellovsky D.
Berkieta T.
7-656-4
Brunclik P.[6]
Summers M.
6-776-36-3
Xilas I.
Naw H.
6-46-4
Basic M.
Agafonov E.
6-46-1
Melnic V.
Binda A.[9]
6-42-67-5
Vasa E.
Niklas Salminen P.
6-27-63
Simakin I.[2]
Bakshi A.
6-16-2
Fomin S.[8]
Blanch D.
6-727-616-3
Marrero Curbelo I.
Maguire C.
6-06-2
Erhard M.[4]
Ehrenschneider N.
6-46-4
Bobichon M.
Dzhavakian Y.
6-16-4
Zakaryia F.
Bar Biryukov P.[3]
4-66-23-1