Semen Pankin vs Olaf Pieczkowski — Manama 2 CH Round of 32

Manama 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS
Semen Pankin
#436ATP
26 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
hard
POL
Olaf Pieczkowski
#583ATP
1338ELO
1331Hard ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWL
Pankin S.
6-4 7-6
Pieczkowski O.
Pankin S.
6772
Pieczkowski O.
4650

Semen Pankin defeated Olaf Pieczkowski 6-4 7-6 in the Manama 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pankin S.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Pieczkowski O.

Pieczkowski O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Pankin S.

Serve advantage — Pankin S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pankin S.Pieczkowski O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (11 vs 27). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pankin S.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 182 days (−1.5)
Pieczkowski O.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Samuel T.
Simakin I.[2]
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Samuel T.
Bobichon M.
6-36-2
Simakin I.[2]
Brunclik P.[6]
1-67-646-3
Quarter-finals
Simakin I.[2]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-33-66-1
Bobichon M.
Ritschard A.
2-66-46-2
Brunclik P.[6]
Basic M.
6-16-3
Samuel T.
Fomin S.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Fomin S.[8]
Homberg M.
6-07-64
Bobichon M.
Zakaryia F.
6-36-2
Ritschard A.
Kellovsky D.
3-66-17-65
Brunclik P.[6]
Xilas I.
6-26-1
Marrero Curbelo I.
Melnic V.
3-67-666-1
Samuel T.
Pankin S.
6-26-1
Basic M.
Erhard M.[4]
6-46-3
Simakin I.[2]
Vasa E.
6-46-1
R32
Samuel T.
Sinclair C.
6-36-0
Pankin S.
Pieczkowski O.
6-47-65
Homberg M.
Ouakaa A.
6-27-5
Ritschard A.
Albot R.
6-36-2
Kellovsky D.
Berkieta T.
7-656-4
Brunclik P.[6]
Summers M.
6-776-36-3
Xilas I.
Naw H.
6-46-4
Basic M.
Agafonov E.
6-46-1
Melnic V.
Binda A.[9]
6-42-67-5
Vasa E.
Niklas Salminen P.
6-27-63
Simakin I.[2]
Bakshi A.
6-16-2
Fomin S.[8]
Blanch D.
6-727-616-3
Marrero Curbelo I.
Maguire C.
6-06-2
Erhard M.[4]
Ehrenschneider N.
6-46-4
Bobichon M.
Dzhavakian Y.
6-16-4
Zakaryia F.
Bar Biryukov P.[3]
4-66-23-1