Bernard Tomic vs Marek Gengel — Playford CH Round of 32

Playford CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS3
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
hard
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#370ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Tomic B.
6-2 6-3
Gengel M.
Tomic B.
662
Gengel M.
230

Bernard Tomic defeated Marek Gengel 6-2 6-3 in the Playford CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 58). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
11
Break points saved·Dominant
92
35
Break points won·Slight edge
4
11
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gengel M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+64 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1377
6.3Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1411
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.6
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
5.7
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Gengel M.
Freshness·
78
—

Tomic B.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hijikata R.[2]
Sweeny D.[7]
6-06-786-4
Semi-finals
Hijikata R.[2]
Bolt A.[4]
6-36-3
Sweeny D.[7]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-665-77-65
Quarter-finals
Hijikata R.[2]
Mccabe J.[6]
7-626-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Noguchi R.[8]
7-656-2
Sweeny D.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-26-4
Bolt A.[4]
Overbeck C.
7-656-4
R16
Overbeck C.
Kubler J.[5]
6-33-1
Sekulic P.
Tomic B.[3]
3-67-646-4
Sweeny D.[7]
Shiraishi H.
6-26-4
Bolt A.[4]
Marinkov P.
6-37-5
Mccabe J.[6]
Polmans M.
6-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Singh K.
6-46-1
Noguchi R.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Hijikata R.[2]
Sach T.
6-36-2
R32
Marinkov P.
Ellis B.
2-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Imamura M.
6-36-2
Singh K.
Isomura K.
5-76-46-3
Noguchi R.[8]
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Tomic B.[3]
Gengel M.
6-26-3
Sekulic P.
Hewitt C.
7-56-2
Shiraishi H.
Matsuda R.
6-43-67-5
Sweeny D.[7]
Bass F.
3-66-16-3
Kubler J.[5]
Tu L.
6-36-3
Bolt A.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-46-2
Polmans M.
Matsuoka H.
4-66-46-1
Sach T.
Wu T.
7-53-66-2
Hijikata R.[2]
Kumasaka T.
6-26-0
Moriya H.
Langmo C.
6-46-3
Overbeck C.
Dellavedova M.
3-67-56-2
Mccabe J.[6]
Bicknell B.
6-46-1