Blaise Bicknell vs Reese Stalder — Playford CH Qualifying Round 1

Playford CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
JAM3
Blaise Bicknell
#354ATP
1313ELO
1290Hard ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
hard
USA
Reese Stalder
#1565ATP
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Bicknell B.
6-3 6-0
Stalder R.
Bicknell B.
662
Stalder R.
300

Blaise Bicknell defeated Reese Stalder 6-3 6-0 in the Playford CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bicknell B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Stalder R.

Stalder R.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bicknell B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bicknell B.Stalder R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (46 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bicknell B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Stalder R.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 104 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
1.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
2.9
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bicknell B.Stalder R.
Freshness·
99
—

Bicknell B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Overbeck C.[8]
Imamura M.[4]
6-45-76-1
Kumasaka T.[2]
Vithoontien L.[9]
6-36-2
Bicknell B.[3]
Ichikawa T.
7-55-77-5
Wu T.[1]
Yamanaka T.
6-36-3
Matsuda R.[5]
Jones H.
6-47-5
Bass F.
Marinkov P.[6]
6-23-66-3
Q1
Jones H.
Charlton J.[11]
7-646-3
Vithoontien L.[9]
Walkin B.
W/O
Wu T.[1]
Jovanovski D.
6-36-3
Yamanaka T.
Rai A.[7]
6-34-66-2
Overbeck C.[8]
Tajima N.
6-26-2
Marinkov P.[6]
Pearson K.
7-646-4
Bass F.
Hazawa S.[12]
1-66-36-4
Bicknell B.[3]
Stalder R.
6-36-0
Imamura M.[4]
Cook E.
6-41-66-2
Kumasaka T.[2]
Hulme M.
7-656-4
Ichikawa T.
Hudd E.[10]
6-26-707-64
Matsuda R.[5]
Delaney J.
4-66-26-2