Dominik Kellovsky vs Tomasz Berkieta — Manama 2 CH Round of 32

Manama 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CZE
Dominik Kellovsky
#815ATP
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
hard
POL
Tomasz Berkieta
#543ATP
1182ELO
1211Hard ELO
19 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLWW
Kellovsky D.
7-6 6-4
Berkieta T.
Kellovsky D.
7762
Berkieta T.
6540

Dominik Kellovsky defeated Tomasz Berkieta 7-6 6-4 in the Manama 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kellovsky D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Berkieta T.

Berkieta T.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kellovsky D.

Serve advantage — Kellovsky D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kellovsky D.Berkieta T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
44%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
6.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kellovsky D.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Berkieta T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kellovsky D.Berkieta T.
Freshness·
—
100

Berkieta T.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Samuel T.
Simakin I.[2]
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Samuel T.
Bobichon M.
6-36-2
Simakin I.[2]
Brunclik P.[6]
1-67-646-3
Quarter-finals
Simakin I.[2]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-33-66-1
Bobichon M.
Ritschard A.
2-66-46-2
Brunclik P.[6]
Basic M.
6-16-3
Samuel T.
Fomin S.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Fomin S.[8]
Homberg M.
6-07-64
Bobichon M.
Zakaryia F.
6-36-2
Ritschard A.
Kellovsky D.
3-66-17-65
Brunclik P.[6]
Xilas I.
6-26-1
Marrero Curbelo I.
Melnic V.
3-67-666-1
Samuel T.
Pankin S.
6-26-1
Basic M.
Erhard M.[4]
6-46-3
Simakin I.[2]
Vasa E.
6-46-1
R32
Samuel T.
Sinclair C.
6-36-0
Pankin S.
Pieczkowski O.
6-47-65
Homberg M.
Ouakaa A.
6-27-5
Ritschard A.
Albot R.
6-36-2
Kellovsky D.
Berkieta T.
7-656-4
Brunclik P.[6]
Summers M.
6-776-36-3
Xilas I.
Naw H.
6-46-4
Basic M.
Agafonov E.
6-46-1
Melnic V.
Binda A.[9]
6-42-67-5
Vasa E.
Niklas Salminen P.
6-27-63
Simakin I.[2]
Bakshi A.
6-16-2
Fomin S.[8]
Blanch D.
6-727-616-3
Marrero Curbelo I.
Maguire C.
6-06-2
Erhard M.[4]
Ehrenschneider N.
6-46-4
Bobichon M.
Dzhavakian Y.
6-16-4
Zakaryia F.
Bar Biryukov P.[3]
4-66-23-1