Ivan Gakhov vs Carlos Taberner — Montemar CH Round of 16

Montemar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#387ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 November 2025
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP1
Carlos Taberner
#194ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Gakhov I.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Taberner C.
Gakhov I.
6362
Taberner C.
4631

Ivan Gakhov defeated Carlos Taberner 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Montemar CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Carlos Taberner came in ranked #194, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
1.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
74
Break points won·Dominant
9
59
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
75
Tiebreaks·Even
22
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Taberner C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
7.8+220 Clay Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1610
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
4.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kolar Z.[7]
Cadenasso G.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Cadenasso G.
Giustino L.[6]
6-17-65
Kolar Z.[7]
Trungelliti M.[2]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Cadenasso G.
Piraino G.
6-06-2
Kolar Z.[7]
Moller E.[3]
6-36-1
Giustino L.[6]
Gakhov I.
6-05-76-2
Trungelliti M.[2]
Nedic A.
2-66-36-3
R16
Gakhov I.
Taberner C.[1]
6-43-66-3
Piraino G.
Merida Aguilar D.[4]
3-67-57-66
Cadenasso G.
Tabur C.[5]
7-57-5
Kolar Z.[7]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
0-66-36-4
Moller E.[3]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-46-3
Nedic A.
Santamarta Roig A.
6-46-2
Trungelliti M.[2]
Cretu C.
6-26-4
Giustino L.[6]
Damas M.
6-36-4
R32
Gakhov I.
Andreev A.
6-36-3
Giustino L.[6]
Moroni F.
6-46-1
Merida Aguilar D.[4]
Garcia Garcia A.
6-36-0
Piraino G.
Burdet A.
6-46-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gulin S.
6-26-776-4
Moller E.[3]
Pereira T.
5-76-36-2
Nedic A.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-16-1
Cretu C.
Bondioli F.
7-626-3
Trungelliti M.[2]
Jianu F.
7-56-736-4
Damas M.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-47-63
Alcala Gurri M.
Butvilas E.
6-26-4
Santamarta Roig A.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
6-36-4
Taberner C.[1]
Palosi S.
6-06-1
Kolar Z.[7]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Agamenone F.
6-36-0
Cadenasso G.
Michalski D.
6-42-66-4