Carl Emil Overbeck vs Jake Delaney — Sydney CH Round of 32

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
DEN
Carl Emil Overbeck
#430ATP
1293ELO
1271Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 November 2025
hard
AUS
Jake Delaney
#383ATP
1103ELO
1088Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLLL
Overbeck C.
6-3 6-2
Delaney J.
Overbeck C.
662
Delaney J.
320

Carl Emil Overbeck defeated Jake Delaney 6-3 6-2 in the Sydney CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jake Delaney came in ranked #383, defending last year's round of 32, but Carl Emil Overbeck had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 8 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Overbeck C.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Delaney J.

Delaney J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Overbeck C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Overbeck C.Delaney J.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Clear edge
53%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.1
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Overbeck C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Delaney J.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.3+183 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1088
7.4Overall Elo 1293
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1103
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
5.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
6.9
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Matsuoka H.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Kubler J.[4]
7-56-2
Matsuoka H.
Mccabe J.[5]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Mccabe J.[5]
Hijikata R.[2]
6-37-5
Kubler J.[4]
Bolt A.[7]
7-56-3
Matsuoka H.
Sach T.
4-67-56-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Sweeny D.[6]
6-26-3
R16
Kubler J.[4]
Gengel M.
6-46-2
Mccabe J.[5]
Singh K.
6-36-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Dellavedova M.
6-36-0
Sweeny D.[6]
Wu T.
6-17-65
Bolt A.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-26-1
Sach T.
Ellis B.
W/O
Hijikata R.[2]
Overbeck C.
7-637-62
Matsuoka H.
Hewitt C.
5-76-37-5
R32
Sweeny D.[6]
Langmo C.
2-0
Sach T.
Noguchi R.[8]
2-66-16-2
Singh K.
Shah A.
7-626-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Bouzige M.
6-46-1
Dellavedova M.
Peliwo F.
6-26-2
Wu T.
Polmans M.
6-43-67-5
Kubler J.[4]
Marinkov P.
6-31-66-2
Hewitt C.
Jasika O.
3-67-666-4
Mccabe J.[5]
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Hijikata R.[2]
Bicknell B.
6-45-76-2
Gengel M.
Jones H.
5-76-47-5
Bolt A.[7]
Kumasaka T.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Hazawa S.
6-706-26-4
Overbeck C.
Delaney J.
6-36-2
Sekulic P.
Hudd E.
6-32-66-3
Matsuoka H.
Tomic B.[3]
6-40-0