Beibit Zhukayev vs Mika Brunold — Bergamo CH Round of 32

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#316ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 November 2025
hard
SUI
Mika Brunold
#408ATP
1466ELO
1443Hard ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Zhukayev B.
6-3 1-6 6-3
Brunold M.
Zhukayev B.
6162
Brunold M.
3631

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Mika Brunold 6-3 1-6 6-3 in the Bergamo CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Beibit Zhukayev closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Brunold M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve advantage — Brunold M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Brunold M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.5
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Brunold M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
30
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
72
Break points won·Clear edge
1
15
Deciding sets·Clear edge
24
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Brunold M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1402
Surface ELO
5.6+42 Hard Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1455
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1466
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Maestrelli F.[8]
Topo M.
6-33-66-1
Semi-finals
Maestrelli F.[8]
Engel J.
6-46-2
Topo M.
Travaglia S.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.
Arnaboldi F.
6-36-3
Topo M.
Passaro F.[4]
7-56-3
Maestrelli F.[8]
Napolitano S.
6-37-67
Engel J.
Guerrieri A.
6-33-67-64
R16
Travaglia S.
Karol M.
6-47-5
Passaro F.[4]
Sciahbasi L.
6-26-3
Topo M.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-64
Maestrelli F.[8]
Gadamauri B.
6-36-3
Napolitano S.
Visker N.
6-46-4
Guerrieri A.
Donski A.
6-46-0
Arnaboldi F.
Fatic N.
7-54-67-5
Engel J.
Lajal M.[7]
W/O
R32
Engel J.
Stewart H.
2-1
Maestrelli F.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-43-67-63
Zhukayev B.
Brunold M.
6-31-66-3
Arnaboldi F.
Mochizuki S.[1]
7-644-66-2
Passaro F.[4]
Ribecai M.
7-666-2
Sciahbasi L.
Durasovic V.
3-67-657-5
Topo M.
Choinski J.[5]
7-636-4
Napolitano S.
Virtanen O.[3]
3-67-666-4
Donski A.
Tabacco F.
4-66-36-4
Guerrieri A.
Harris B.[2]
6-757-56-3
Gadamauri B.
Basile P.
6-36-2
Visker N.
Gentzsch T.
7-636-4
Lajal M.[7]
Vatutin A.
5-77-56-3
Karol M.
Pellegrino A.[6]
6-46-2
Travaglia S.
Dodig M.
6-33-67-64
Fatic N.
Andaloro F.
6-46-6