Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi vs Tristan Mccormick — Guayaquil CH Round of 32

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
#320ATP
1392ELO
1382Clay ELO
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 November 2025
clay
USA
Tristan Mccormick
1086ELO
1084Clay ELO
27 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLW
Ambrogi L.
6-2 7-5
Mccormick T.
Ambrogi L.
672
Mccormick T.
250

Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi defeated Tristan Mccormick 6-2 7-5 in the Guayaquil CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ambrogi L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mccormick T.

Mccormick T.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ambrogi L.

Serve advantage — Ambrogi L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ambrogi L.Mccormick T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.3
6.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ambrogi L.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Mccormick T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+298 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Clay Elo 1084
7.5Overall Elo 1392
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1086
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ambrogi L.Mccormick T.
Freshness·Slight edge
81
75

Ambrogi L.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 43 games (7d) · Mccormick T.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Vallejo A.[2]
Varillas J.
7-56-776-3
Semi-finals
Varillas J.
Gomez F.[8]
6-46-4
Vallejo A.[2]
Guillen Meza A.[4]
4-66-26-3
Quarter-finals
Gomez F.[8]
Andrade A.[9]
6-32-66-4
Varillas J.
Habib H.[3]
7-53-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Mena F.
6-16-4
Vallejo A.[2]
Ambrogi L.
6-26-4
R16
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Casanova H.
6-13-0
Andrade A.[9]
Jorda Sanchis D.
7-653-66-2
Ambrogi L.
Bueno G.[5]
6-26-1
Varillas J.
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
6-07-5
Gomez F.[8]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
6-17-66
Habib H.[3]
Aguilar Cardozo J.
6-37-5
Mena F.
Estevez J.
7-54-66-0
Vallejo A.[2]
Martinez L.
6-26-3
R32
Martinez L.
Galarraga M.
6-736-24-0
Andrade A.[9]
Gima S.
6-16-2
Varillas J.
Aguilar J.
6-46-1
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
Yunez L.
6-41-67-5
Habib H.[3]
Price S.
6-26-0
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
Dickerson R.
6-16-1
Estevez J.
Rodriguez L.
6-46-2
Casanova H.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-24-66-2
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Camacho E.
6-26-3
Bueno G.[5]
Aguilar Cardozo F.
6-26-4
Vallejo A.[2]
Ratti L.
6-26-1
Jorda Sanchis D.
Huertas Del Pino A.
3-66-46-3
Gomez F.[8]
Martinez T.
6-26-1
Mena F.
Pacheco Mendez R.[6]
3-66-06-0
Ambrogi L.
Mccormick T.
6-27-5
Aguilar Cardozo J.
Roncadelli F.
7-663-0