Dane Sweeny vs Bernard Tomic — Brisbane 3 CH Quarter-final

Brisbane 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS7
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS3
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Sweeny D.
5-7 6-3 6-2
Tomic B.
Sweeny D.
5662
Tomic B.
7321

Dane Sweeny defeated Bernard Tomic 5-7 6-3 6-2 in the Brisbane 3 CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sweeny D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sweeny D.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sweeny D.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
45
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
92
Break points won·Slight edge
11
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
68
74
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sweeny D.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 161 days (−1.5)
Tomic B.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.4+3 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1441
5.3Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1475
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
1.5
Surface form
6.1
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sweeny D.Tomic B.
Freshness·Clear edge
97
81

Sweeny D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tomic B.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bolt A.[6]
Wu T.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Matsuoka H.
6-37-64
Bolt A.[6]
Sweeny D.[7]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.[6]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-56-1
Sweeny D.[7]
Tomic B.[3]
5-76-36-2
Matsuoka H.
Delaney J.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Overbeck C.
6-36-4
R16
Wu T.
Hewitt C.
3-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Ellis B.
3-66-16-4
Tomic B.[3]
Gengel M.
7-53-67-63
Matsuoka H.
Hudd E.
6-46-4
Bolt A.[6]
Polmans M.
6-46-0
Sweeny D.[7]
Sach T.
6-26-3
Overbeck C.
Vithoontien L.
6-27-61
Delaney J.
Rottgering M.
6-726-33-2
R32
Delaney J.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-27-63
Ellis B.
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Polmans M.
Shah A.
1-67-666-1
Bolt A.[6]
Peliwo F.
6-46-2
Tomic B.[3]
Tu L.
6-47-5
Gengel M.
Singh K.
6-26-4
Sach T.
Moriya H.
3-66-46-2
Rottgering M.
Bicknell B.
6-36-1
Hudd E.
Dellavedova M.
6-12-66-2
Matsuoka H.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-2
Overbeck C.
Sekulic P.
6-36-3
Hewitt C.
Mccabe J.[5]
6-26-1
Wu T.
Langmo C.
7-656-4
Vithoontien L.
Kubler J.[4]
6-33-66-3
Sweeny D.[7]
Marinkov P.
6-06-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Jasika O.
6-03-2