Tung Lin Wu vs Carl Emil Overbeck — Brisbane 3 CH Quarter-final

Brisbane 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
DEN
Carl Emil Overbeck
#345ATP
1293ELO
1271Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLW
Wu T.
6-3 6-4
Overbeck C.
Wu T.
662
Overbeck C.
340

Tung Lin Wu defeated Carl Emil Overbeck 6-3 6-4 in the Brisbane 3 CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Overbeck C.

Overbeck C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Overbeck C.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Overbeck C.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 399 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.7+105 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1271
6.8Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1293
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Overbeck C.
Freshness·
88
—

Wu T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bolt A.[6]
Wu T.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Matsuoka H.
6-37-64
Bolt A.[6]
Sweeny D.[7]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.[6]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-56-1
Sweeny D.[7]
Tomic B.[3]
5-76-36-2
Matsuoka H.
Delaney J.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Overbeck C.
6-36-4
R16
Wu T.
Hewitt C.
3-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Ellis B.
3-66-16-4
Tomic B.[3]
Gengel M.
7-53-67-63
Matsuoka H.
Hudd E.
6-46-4
Bolt A.[6]
Polmans M.
6-46-0
Sweeny D.[7]
Sach T.
6-26-3
Overbeck C.
Vithoontien L.
6-27-61
Delaney J.
Rottgering M.
6-726-33-2
R32
Delaney J.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-27-63
Ellis B.
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Polmans M.
Shah A.
1-67-666-1
Bolt A.[6]
Peliwo F.
6-46-2
Tomic B.[3]
Tu L.
6-47-5
Gengel M.
Singh K.
6-26-4
Sach T.
Moriya H.
3-66-46-2
Rottgering M.
Bicknell B.
6-36-1
Hudd E.
Dellavedova M.
6-12-66-2
Matsuoka H.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-2
Overbeck C.
Sekulic P.
6-36-3
Hewitt C.
Mccabe J.[5]
6-26-1
Wu T.
Langmo C.
7-656-4
Vithoontien L.
Kubler J.[4]
6-33-66-3
Sweeny D.[7]
Marinkov P.
6-06-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Jasika O.
6-03-2