Daniel Milavsky vs Aristotelis Thanos — Drummondville CH Round of 32

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Daniel Milavsky
#335ATP
1349ELO
1337Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
GRE
Aristotelis Thanos
#603ATP
1267ELO
1255Hard ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
Milavsky D.
6-3 6-4
Thanos A.
Milavsky D.
662
Thanos A.
340

Daniel Milavsky defeated Aristotelis Thanos 6-3 6-4 in the Drummondville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Milavsky D.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Thanos A.

Thanos A.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Milavsky D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Milavsky D.Thanos A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Milavsky D.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Thanos A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+83 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1255
6.1Overall Elo 1349
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
1.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Milavsky D.Thanos A.
Freshness·
68
—

Milavsky D.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Glinka D.[4]
Chan D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Glinka D.[4]
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-64
Chan D.
Broom C.
6-736-36-3
Quarter-finals
Glinka D.[4]
Martin D.
6-43-66-4
Kasnikowski M.
Draxl L.[1]
6-46-3
Chan D.
Boitan G.[8]
6-47-5
Broom C.
Wessels L.
6-31-66-1
R16
Kasnikowski M.
Mmoh M.[7]
1-66-44-0
Draxl L.[1]
Mccormick T.
6-737-676-3
Glinka D.[4]
Kim J.
6-756-36-2
Martin D.
Rice K.
6-727-56-3
Boitan G.[8]
Ilagan A.
6-47-65
Wessels L.
Trotter J.[5]
6-43-67-65
Broom C.
Milavsky D.
2-66-46-2
Chan D.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
R32
Mccormick T.
Boulais J.
6-46-0
Kasnikowski M.
Wiskandt M.
3-66-46-1
Glinka D.[4]
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kim J.
Baadi T.
6-36-3
Milavsky D.
Thanos A.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Arseneault N.
3-66-36-0
Chan D.
Poling K.
6-36-4
Draxl L.[1]
Arseneault M.
3-67-656-0
Rice K.
Rybakov A.[6]
4-67-656-3
Trotter J.[5]
Poljak D.
6-26-3
Broom C.
Zahraj P.[3]
6-36-2
Boitan G.[8]
Banerjee S.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Chidekh C.[2]
7-56-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Harper C.
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Aguilar J.
6-16-1
Martin D.
Winter E.
6-36-3