Dan Martin vs Edward Winter — Drummondville CH Round of 32

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CAN
Dan Martin
1313ELO
1276Hard ELO
27 yrs · 175 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
AUS
Edward Winter
#385ATP
1434ELO
1404Hard ELO
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLL
Martin D.
6-3 6-3
Winter E.
Martin D.
662
Winter E.
330

Dan Martin defeated Edward Winter 6-3 6-3 in the Drummondville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Winter E.

Winter E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Martin D.

Serve advantage — Winter E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martin D.Winter E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Winter E.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1276
Surface ELO
5.9+128 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1313
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1434
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martin D.Winter E.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
62

Martin D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 27 games (7d) · Winter E.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 36 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Glinka D.[4]
Chan D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Glinka D.[4]
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-64
Chan D.
Broom C.
6-736-36-3
Quarter-finals
Glinka D.[4]
Martin D.
6-43-66-4
Kasnikowski M.
Draxl L.[1]
6-46-3
Chan D.
Boitan G.[8]
6-47-5
Broom C.
Wessels L.
6-31-66-1
R16
Kasnikowski M.
Mmoh M.[7]
1-66-44-0
Draxl L.[1]
Mccormick T.
6-737-676-3
Glinka D.[4]
Kim J.
6-756-36-2
Martin D.
Rice K.
6-727-56-3
Boitan G.[8]
Ilagan A.
6-47-65
Wessels L.
Trotter J.[5]
6-43-67-65
Broom C.
Milavsky D.
2-66-46-2
Chan D.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
R32
Mccormick T.
Boulais J.
6-46-0
Kasnikowski M.
Wiskandt M.
3-66-46-1
Glinka D.[4]
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kim J.
Baadi T.
6-36-3
Milavsky D.
Thanos A.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Arseneault N.
3-66-36-0
Chan D.
Poling K.
6-36-4
Draxl L.[1]
Arseneault M.
3-67-656-0
Rice K.
Rybakov A.[6]
4-67-656-3
Trotter J.[5]
Poljak D.
6-26-3
Broom C.
Zahraj P.[3]
6-36-2
Boitan G.[8]
Banerjee S.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Chidekh C.[2]
7-56-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Harper C.
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Aguilar J.
6-16-1
Martin D.
Winter E.
6-36-3