Eva Vedder vs Carolina Kuhl — W35 Orlando FL Round of 16

W35 Orlando FL · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
NED
Eva Vedder
#179WTA
1537ELO
1478Clay ELO
26 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
clay
GER
Carolina Kuhl
#618WTA
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLLW
Vedder E.
6-2 0-0
Kuhl C.
Vedder E.
601
Kuhl C.
20–

Eva Vedder defeated Carolina Kuhl 6-2 0-0 in the W35 Orlando FL round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Eva Vedder came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 0–0.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vedder E.serving50% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Kuhl C.

Kuhl C.serving40% hold

wins 46% of points on serve vs Vedder E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vedder E.Kuhl C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
44%
Service points won·Even
57%
53%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
51%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vedder E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuhl C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Duerst J.
Payne B.
6-46-4
Udvardy L.
Matoula M.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Payne B.
Scott K.
2-66-46-3
Duerst J.
Plekhanova D.
6-36-3
Matoula M.
Hu V.
6-46-3
Udvardy L.
Okutoyi A.
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Scott K.
Ekstrand M.
2-67-56-2
Plekhanova D.
Bhatia R.
6-36-7106-3
Duerst J.
Zamarripa A.
7-56-1
Payne B.
Snells J.
6-24-66-2
Okutoyi A.
Pace F.
6-26-2
Udvardy L.
Topalova G.
6-36-1
R16
Payne B.
Jones M.
6-26-1
Scott K.
Reed L.
6-16-0
Plekhanova D.
Jauffret C.
6-34-66-2
Ekstrand M.
Nguyen A.
6-14-66-1
Bhatia R.
Loudili S.
6-16-0
Snells J.
Zamarripa M.
1-66-47-5
Duerst J.
Price G.
6-01-1
Vedder E.
Kuhl C.
6-20-0
Topalova G.
Reami A.
6-26-0
Okutoyi A.
Biolay S.
6-36-3
Pace F.
Burgic E.
6-36-4
Hu V.
Penickova A.
6-46-0
Udvardy L.
Seibold E.
7-56-2
Urhobo A.
Newman W.
6-26-2
Matoula M.
Penickova K.
6-746-26-4
R32
Scott K.
Burgic E.
6-43-2
Reed L.
Evtimova D.
6-26-2
Loudili S.
Cadar E.
5-76-36-4
Price G.
Grover S.
6-36-1
Zamarripa M.
Ivanova D.
6-37-63
Nguyen A.
Slama M.
6-12-66-2
Duerst J.
Barrera Aguirre I.
7-56-4
Jones M.
Shabashkevich K.
6-46-2
Ekstrand M.
Collins K.
7-630-66-2
Plekhanova D.
Bulger H.
4-66-46-2
Snells J.
Fagan S.
6-26-1
Jauffret C.
Hitt Z.
6-16-1
Payne B.
Traynor O.
6-41-67-62
Zamarripa A.
Llewellyn S.
6-26-3
Bhatia R.
Broadfoot G.
6-36-4
Martinez V.
Cabezas Dominguez S.
7-56-3
Okutoyi A.
Lee N.
6-17-5
Topalova G.
Rajeshwaran Revathi M.
4-67-6136-1
Hu V.
Bertoldo J.
6-06-1
Penickova K.
Zamarripa M.
6-36-2
Reami A.
Collins K.
6-33-67-65
Matoula M.
Cadar E.
6-36-2
Pace F.
Zamarripa A.
6-36-3
Urhobo A.
Bertacchi A.
6-06-3
Newman W.
Simion O.
6-16-4
Kuhl C.
Bohrer Martins C.
6-36-4
Biolay S.
Cherubini D.
6-11-0
Udvardy L.
Sahdiieva A.
6-26-3
Seibold E.
Crossley M.
6-46-3
Burgic E.
Mandelikova K.
6-16-1
Vedder E.
Nguyen A.
6-06-0
Penickova A.
Shao C.
6-26-3