Adam Jilly vs Keegan Smith — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
HUN
Adam Jilly
#1115ATP
19 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
L
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
USA
Keegan Smith
#247ATP
1421ELO
1395Hard ELO
28 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLL
Jilly A.
6-4 6-2
Smith K.
Jilly A.
662
Smith K.
420

Adam Jilly defeated Keegan Smith 6-4 6-2 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jilly A.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Smith K.

Smith K.serving92% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Jilly A.

Serve advantage — Smith K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Jilly A.Smith K.
1st serve in·Dominant
46%
73%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
25%
36%
Break points saved·Dominant
40%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.0
6.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (1 vs 52). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jilly A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Smith K.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.7
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.4
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jilly A.Smith K.
Freshness·
—
78

Smith K.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 36 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.
Cassone M.[4]
7-637-5
Semi-finals
Cassone M.[4]
Miyoshi K.
6-22-66-4
Kozlov S.
Stebe C.
6-04-0
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.
Martinez A.
3-66-37-5
Cassone M.[4]
Rosenkranz M.[5]
7-646-3
Kozlov S.
Blanch D.
6-26-776-3
Miyoshi K.
Al Azmeh T.
7-56-2
R16
Kozlov S.
Zink T.[8]
6-36-3
Rosenkranz M.[5]
Ganesan A.
6-16-2
Cassone M.[4]
Mchugh A.
1-67-606-3
Al Azmeh T.
Martin A.[6]
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Azkara A.
6-36-4
Miyoshi K.
Braswell M.
2-66-06-3
Martinez A.
Jilly A.
6-36-2
Stebe C.
Friend J.
7-667-5
R32
Martin A.[6]
Fishback R.
6-37-64
Stebe C.
Mejia N.[1]
7-656-3
Friend J.
Perez A.
6-45-76-3
Martinez A.
Purtseladze S.[7]
7-53-67-67
Blanch D.
Krueger M.[3]
6-37-65
Kozlov S.
Borg L.
6-16-0
Zink T.[8]
Mitsui S.
7-656-1
Rosenkranz M.[5]
Martinez Gomez P.
6-36-3
Mchugh A.
Zhang J.
6-756-37-5
Cassone M.[4]
Roh H.
6-06-2
Al Azmeh T.
Colleu S.
6-26-756-1
Miyoshi K.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Braswell M.
Monday J.[2]
7-686-4
Jilly A.
Smith K.
6-46-2
Ganesan A.
Okonkwo O.
6-37-5
Azkara A.
Maxted L.
6-36-4