Bernard Tomic vs Marek Gengel — Brisbane 3 CH Round of 16

Brisbane 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS3
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Tomic B.
7-5 3-6 7-6
Gengel M.
Tomic B.
73772
Gengel M.
56631

Bernard Tomic defeated Marek Gengel 7-5 3-6 7-6 in the Brisbane 3 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 58). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
11
Break points saved·Dominant
92
35
Break points won·Slight edge
4
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Gengel M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+64 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1377
6.3Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1411
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
1.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Gengel M.
Freshness·
84
—

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bolt A.[6]
Wu T.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Matsuoka H.
6-37-64
Bolt A.[6]
Sweeny D.[7]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.[6]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-56-1
Sweeny D.[7]
Tomic B.[3]
5-76-36-2
Matsuoka H.
Delaney J.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Overbeck C.
6-36-4
R16
Wu T.
Hewitt C.
3-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Ellis B.
3-66-16-4
Tomic B.[3]
Gengel M.
7-53-67-63
Matsuoka H.
Hudd E.
6-46-4
Bolt A.[6]
Polmans M.
6-46-0
Sweeny D.[7]
Sach T.
6-26-3
Overbeck C.
Vithoontien L.
6-27-61
Delaney J.
Rottgering M.
6-726-33-2
R32
Delaney J.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-27-63
Ellis B.
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Polmans M.
Shah A.
1-67-666-1
Bolt A.[6]
Peliwo F.
6-46-2
Tomic B.[3]
Tu L.
6-47-5
Gengel M.
Singh K.
6-26-4
Sach T.
Moriya H.
3-66-46-2
Rottgering M.
Bicknell B.
6-36-1
Hudd E.
Dellavedova M.
6-12-66-2
Matsuoka H.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-2
Overbeck C.
Sekulic P.
6-36-3
Hewitt C.
Mccabe J.[5]
6-26-1
Wu T.
Langmo C.
7-656-4
Vithoontien L.
Kubler J.[4]
6-33-66-3
Sweeny D.[7]
Marinkov P.
6-06-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Jasika O.
6-03-2