Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Tatum Evans — W15 Clemson SC Round of 32

W15 Clemson SC · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Rose Marie Nijkamp
#802WTA
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
USA
Tatum Evans
#728WTA
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWW
Nijkamp R.
6-2 7-5
Evans T.
Nijkamp R.
672
Evans T.
25–

Rose Marie Nijkamp defeated Tatum Evans 6-2 7-5 in the W15 Clemson SC round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nijkamp R.serving35% hold

wins 44% of points on serve vs Evans T.

Evans T.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Nijkamp R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nijkamp R.Evans T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
38%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
52%
59%
Return points won·Even
49%
51%
Break points saved·Even
50%
49%
Aces / match·Slight edge
0.6
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.3
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nijkamp R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Evans T.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 385 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
4.2
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Bennett D.
Payne B.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Payne B.
Smejkalova A.
6-26-2
Bennett D.
Nijkamp R.
6-756-36-0
Quarter-finals
Payne B.
Xu A.
6-12-66-4
R16
Schuman A.
Hofbauer K.
6-06-3
Mckenzie K.
Kinard T.
5-76-26-3
Xu A.
Tanguilig C.
7-55-76-2
Bennett D.
Groen J.
6-36-4
Nijkamp R.
Soulie A.
6-26-0
Smejkalova A.
Dilek D.
7-625-76-1
Payne B.
Conway J.
6-16-1
Charney E.
Cisovska R.
0-67-56-4
R32
Kinard T.
Rojas S.
2-66-36-2
Payne B.
Hoo C.
6-05-76-1
Charney E.
Jauffret C.
6-16-3
Dilek D.
Elizarova S.
7-626-1
Conway J.
Dean J.
6-46-0
Schuman A.
Adrover Gallego I.
6-26-4
Soulie A.
Bhakta R.
6-26-3
Bennett D.
Dada Mascoll S.
6-36-4
Mckenzie K.
Mulville V.
4-66-37-5
Tanguilig C.
Poling L.
6-16-0
Cisovska R.
Tanasie L.
6-46-4
Groen J.
Bergkvist Larsson B.
4-66-16-3
Nijkamp R.
Evans T.
6-27-5
Xu A.
Yecora C.
6-36-3
Smejkalova A.
Okuwaki R.
6-36-1
Hofbauer K.
Buchnik M.
7-657-66