Charles Broom vs Patrick Zahraj — Drummondville CH Round of 32

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
GER3
Patrick Zahraj
#425ATP
1331ELO
1322Hard ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Broom C.
6-3 6-2
Zahraj P.
Broom C.
662
Zahraj P.
320

Charles Broom defeated Patrick Zahraj 6-3 6-2 in the Drummondville CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Charles Broom came in ranked #283, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zahraj P.

Zahraj P.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Zahraj P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.6
5.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Zahraj P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
56
69
Break points won·Slight edge
0
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Zahraj P.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+74 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1322
5.9Overall Elo 1409
ELO gap
4.1Overall Elo 1331
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.9
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Broom C.Zahraj P.
Freshness·Even
77
80

Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Zahraj P.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Glinka D.[4]
Chan D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Glinka D.[4]
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-64
Chan D.
Broom C.
6-736-36-3
Quarter-finals
Glinka D.[4]
Martin D.
6-43-66-4
Kasnikowski M.
Draxl L.[1]
6-46-3
Chan D.
Boitan G.[8]
6-47-5
Broom C.
Wessels L.
6-31-66-1
R16
Kasnikowski M.
Mmoh M.[7]
1-66-44-0
Draxl L.[1]
Mccormick T.
6-737-676-3
Glinka D.[4]
Kim J.
6-756-36-2
Martin D.
Rice K.
6-727-56-3
Boitan G.[8]
Ilagan A.
6-47-65
Wessels L.
Trotter J.[5]
6-43-67-65
Broom C.
Milavsky D.
2-66-46-2
Chan D.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
R32
Mccormick T.
Boulais J.
6-46-0
Kasnikowski M.
Wiskandt M.
3-66-46-1
Glinka D.[4]
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kim J.
Baadi T.
6-36-3
Milavsky D.
Thanos A.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Arseneault N.
3-66-36-0
Chan D.
Poling K.
6-36-4
Draxl L.[1]
Arseneault M.
3-67-656-0
Rice K.
Rybakov A.[6]
4-67-656-3
Trotter J.[5]
Poljak D.
6-26-3
Broom C.
Zahraj P.[3]
6-36-2
Boitan G.[8]
Banerjee S.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Chidekh C.[2]
7-56-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Harper C.
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Aguilar J.
6-16-1
Martin D.
Winter E.
6-36-3