Charles Broom vs Louis Wessels — Drummondville CH Quarter-final

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
Louis Wessels
GER
Louis Wessels
#723ATP
27 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLWLWW
Broom C.
6-3 1-6 6-1
Wessels L.
Broom C.
6162
Wessels L.
3611

Charles Broom defeated Louis Wessels 6-3 1-6 6-1 in the Drummondville CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Charles Broom came in ranked #283, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Charles Broom closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wessels L.

Wessels L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Wessels L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Wessels L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
12
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
56
71
Break points won·Even
0
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
42
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wessels L.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
4.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Broom C.Wessels L.
Freshness·
—
86

Wessels L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Glinka D.[4]
Chan D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Glinka D.[4]
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-64
Chan D.
Broom C.
6-736-36-3
Quarter-finals
Glinka D.[4]
Martin D.
6-43-66-4
Kasnikowski M.
Draxl L.[1]
6-46-3
Chan D.
Boitan G.[8]
6-47-5
Broom C.
Wessels L.
6-31-66-1
R16
Kasnikowski M.
Mmoh M.[7]
1-66-44-0
Draxl L.[1]
Mccormick T.
6-737-676-3
Glinka D.[4]
Kim J.
6-756-36-2
Martin D.
Rice K.
6-727-56-3
Boitan G.[8]
Ilagan A.
6-47-65
Wessels L.
Trotter J.[5]
6-43-67-65
Broom C.
Milavsky D.
2-66-46-2
Chan D.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
R32
Mccormick T.
Boulais J.
6-46-0
Kasnikowski M.
Wiskandt M.
3-66-46-1
Glinka D.[4]
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kim J.
Baadi T.
6-36-3
Milavsky D.
Thanos A.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Arseneault N.
3-66-36-0
Chan D.
Poling K.
6-36-4
Draxl L.[1]
Arseneault M.
3-67-656-0
Rice K.
Rybakov A.[6]
4-67-656-3
Trotter J.[5]
Poljak D.
6-26-3
Broom C.
Zahraj P.[3]
6-36-2
Boitan G.[8]
Banerjee S.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Chidekh C.[2]
7-56-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Harper C.
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Aguilar J.
6-16-1
Martin D.
Winter E.
6-36-3