Kenta Miyoshi vs Taym Al Azmeh — Champaign CH Quarter-final

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN
Kenta Miyoshi
#764ATP
1476ELO
1447Hard ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
GER
Taym Al Azmeh
#980ATP
22 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWW
Miyoshi K.
7-5 6-2
Al Azmeh T.
Miyoshi K.
762
Al Azmeh T.
520

Kenta Miyoshi defeated Taym Al Azmeh 7-5 6-2 in the Champaign CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Kenta Miyoshi came in ranked #764, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Kenta Miyoshi closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Miyoshi K.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Al Azmeh T.

Al Azmeh T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Miyoshi K.

Serve advantage — Al Azmeh T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Miyoshi K.Al Azmeh T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Clear edge
53%
76%
Aces / match·Even
5.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
6.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Miyoshi K.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Al Azmeh T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.
Cassone M.[4]
7-637-5
Semi-finals
Cassone M.[4]
Miyoshi K.
6-22-66-4
Kozlov S.
Stebe C.
6-04-0
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.
Martinez A.
3-66-37-5
Cassone M.[4]
Rosenkranz M.[5]
7-646-3
Kozlov S.
Blanch D.
6-26-776-3
Miyoshi K.
Al Azmeh T.
7-56-2
R16
Kozlov S.
Zink T.[8]
6-36-3
Rosenkranz M.[5]
Ganesan A.
6-16-2
Cassone M.[4]
Mchugh A.
1-67-606-3
Al Azmeh T.
Martin A.[6]
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Azkara A.
6-36-4
Miyoshi K.
Braswell M.
2-66-06-3
Martinez A.
Jilly A.
6-36-2
Stebe C.
Friend J.
7-667-5
R32
Martin A.[6]
Fishback R.
6-37-64
Stebe C.
Mejia N.[1]
7-656-3
Friend J.
Perez A.
6-45-76-3
Martinez A.
Purtseladze S.[7]
7-53-67-67
Blanch D.
Krueger M.[3]
6-37-65
Kozlov S.
Borg L.
6-16-0
Zink T.[8]
Mitsui S.
7-656-1
Rosenkranz M.[5]
Martinez Gomez P.
6-36-3
Mchugh A.
Zhang J.
6-756-37-5
Cassone M.[4]
Roh H.
6-06-2
Al Azmeh T.
Colleu S.
6-26-756-1
Miyoshi K.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Braswell M.
Monday J.[2]
7-686-4
Jilly A.
Smith K.
6-46-2
Ganesan A.
Okonkwo O.
6-37-5
Azkara A.
Maxted L.
6-36-4