Arda Azkara vs Lui Maxted — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Arda Azkara
TUR
Arda Azkara
#697ATP
1308ELO
1293Hard ELO
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 November 2025
hard
GBR
Lui Maxted
#405ATP
22 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLW
Azkara A.
6-3 6-4
Maxted L.
Azkara A.
662
Maxted L.
340

Arda Azkara defeated Lui Maxted 6-3 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Arda Azkara closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Azkara A.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Maxted L.

Maxted L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Azkara A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Azkara A.Maxted L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (15 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Azkara A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Maxted L.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Azkara A.Maxted L.
Freshness·Even
85
88

Azkara A.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d) · Maxted L.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.
Cassone M.[4]
7-637-5
Semi-finals
Cassone M.[4]
Miyoshi K.
6-22-66-4
Kozlov S.
Stebe C.
6-04-0
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.
Martinez A.
3-66-37-5
Cassone M.[4]
Rosenkranz M.[5]
7-646-3
Kozlov S.
Blanch D.
6-26-776-3
Miyoshi K.
Al Azmeh T.
7-56-2
R16
Kozlov S.
Zink T.[8]
6-36-3
Rosenkranz M.[5]
Ganesan A.
6-16-2
Cassone M.[4]
Mchugh A.
1-67-606-3
Al Azmeh T.
Martin A.[6]
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Azkara A.
6-36-4
Miyoshi K.
Braswell M.
2-66-06-3
Martinez A.
Jilly A.
6-36-2
Stebe C.
Friend J.
7-667-5
R32
Martin A.[6]
Fishback R.
6-37-64
Stebe C.
Mejia N.[1]
7-656-3
Friend J.
Perez A.
6-45-76-3
Martinez A.
Purtseladze S.[7]
7-53-67-67
Blanch D.
Krueger M.[3]
6-37-65
Kozlov S.
Borg L.
6-16-0
Zink T.[8]
Mitsui S.
7-656-1
Rosenkranz M.[5]
Martinez Gomez P.
6-36-3
Mchugh A.
Zhang J.
6-756-37-5
Cassone M.[4]
Roh H.
6-06-2
Al Azmeh T.
Colleu S.
6-26-756-1
Miyoshi K.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Braswell M.
Monday J.[2]
7-686-4
Jilly A.
Smith K.
6-46-2
Ganesan A.
Okonkwo O.
6-37-5
Azkara A.
Maxted L.
6-36-4