Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Oliver Tarvet — Knoxville CH Round of 16

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#342ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2025
hard
GBR
Oliver Tarvet
#348ATP
1490ELO
1460Hard ELO
22 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
Stebe C.
6-3 7-6
Tarvet O.
Stebe C.
6772
Tarvet O.
3650

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Oliver Tarvet 6-3 7-6 in the Knoxville CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tarvet O.

Tarvet O.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Tarvet O.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stebe C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Tarvet O.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+63 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1460
5.4Overall Elo 1556
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1490
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.4
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
4.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
2.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Stebe C.Tarvet O.
Freshness·
—
93

Tarvet O.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[5]
Blanch D.
6-726-46-1
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[5]
Stebe C.
6-46-1
Blanch D.
Glinka D.[6]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[5]
Montes De La Torre I.
7-56-4
Stebe C.
Cassone M.
7-6136-3
Glinka D.[6]
Mitsui S.
7-56-3
Blanch D.
Clarke J.[2]
6-37-65
R16
Montes De La Torre I.
Trotter J.[1]
7-637-66
Cassone M.
Mejia N.[3]
6-35-76-3
Krueger M.[5]
Ghibaudo A.
6-26-1
Blanch D.
Martin A.[8]
6-46-4
Clarke J.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-22-66-3
Stebe C.
Tarvet O.
6-37-65
Glinka D.[6]
Perez A.
6-36-4
Mitsui S.
Wiskandt M.
6-16-736-2
R32
Montes De La Torre I.
Rosenkranz M.
6-12-0
Mitsui S.
Suresh D.
7-637-60
Krueger M.[5]
Roh H.
6-26-3
Mejia N.[3]
Thanos A.
6-47-5
Cassone M.
Soto M.
6-36-2
Tarvet O.
Ilagan A.
3-66-37-66
Perez A.
Fenty A.
6-46-3
Wiskandt M.
Borg L.
4-66-16-2
Martin A.[8]
Zink T.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Rolland D.
7-612-66-1
Clarke J.[2]
Rocha F.
6-16-4
Trotter J.[1]
Broom C.
6-41-67-64
Ghibaudo A.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-2
Blanch D.
Kotzen A.
6-46-2
Glinka D.[6]
Makk P.
6-26-4
Stebe C.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-757-626-0