Andres Martin vs Tyler Zink — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Andres Martin
USA8
Andres Martin
1337ELO
1332Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2025
hard
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
Martin A.
6-3 6-2
Zink T.
Martin A.
662
Zink T.
320

Andres Martin defeated Tyler Zink 6-3 6-2 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Zink T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martin A.Zink T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Zink T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.7Hard Elo 1332
Surface ELO
5.3+19 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1337
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1371
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martin A.Zink T.
Freshness·Dominant
62
87

Martin A.: played today · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Zink T.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[5]
Blanch D.
6-726-46-1
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[5]
Stebe C.
6-46-1
Blanch D.
Glinka D.[6]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[5]
Montes De La Torre I.
7-56-4
Stebe C.
Cassone M.
7-6136-3
Glinka D.[6]
Mitsui S.
7-56-3
Blanch D.
Clarke J.[2]
6-37-65
R16
Montes De La Torre I.
Trotter J.[1]
7-637-66
Cassone M.
Mejia N.[3]
6-35-76-3
Krueger M.[5]
Ghibaudo A.
6-26-1
Blanch D.
Martin A.[8]
6-46-4
Clarke J.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-22-66-3
Stebe C.
Tarvet O.
6-37-65
Glinka D.[6]
Perez A.
6-36-4
Mitsui S.
Wiskandt M.
6-16-736-2
R32
Montes De La Torre I.
Rosenkranz M.
6-12-0
Mitsui S.
Suresh D.
7-637-60
Krueger M.[5]
Roh H.
6-26-3
Mejia N.[3]
Thanos A.
6-47-5
Cassone M.
Soto M.
6-36-2
Tarvet O.
Ilagan A.
3-66-37-66
Perez A.
Fenty A.
6-46-3
Wiskandt M.
Borg L.
4-66-16-2
Martin A.[8]
Zink T.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Rolland D.
7-612-66-1
Clarke J.[2]
Rocha F.
6-16-4
Trotter J.[1]
Broom C.
6-41-67-64
Ghibaudo A.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-2
Blanch D.
Kotzen A.
6-46-2
Glinka D.[6]
Makk P.
6-26-4
Stebe C.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-757-626-0