Coleman Wong vs Tsung Hao Huang — Taipei CH Round of 16

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
HKG4
Coleman Wong
#108ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2025
hard
TPE
Tsung Hao Huang
#612ATP
1309ELO
1280Hard ELO
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLWW
Wong C.
6-4 6-4
Huang T.
Wong C.
662
Huang T.
440

Coleman Wong defeated Tsung Hao Huang 6-4 6-4 in the Taipei CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #108.

Key context

  • Match story: Coleman Wong edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Huang T.

Huang T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Serve advantage — Wong C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Huang T.
37
Serve
—
34
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Huang T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
51%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.8
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (99 vs 39). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Huang T.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.6+313 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.4Hard Elo 1280
9.8Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1309
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.5
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
0.0
4.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Huang T.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
78

Wong C.: 20 days rest · Huang T.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 70 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.[2]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-57-65
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Wong C.[4]
6-36-4
Nishioka Y.[2]
Mccabe J.[5]
6-25-76-1
Quarter-finals
Wong C.[4]
Janvier M.
6-46-4
Mccabe J.[5]
Imamura M.
6-41-66-3
Nishioka Y.[2]
Santillan A.
6-25-76-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Uchida K.
6-37-62
R16
Imamura M.
Rodionov J.[3]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Vrbensky M.
6-36-2
Santillan A.
Hsu Y.[7]
3-66-37-5
Janvier M.
Ymer E.[6]
7-56-746-3
Wong C.[4]
Huang T.
6-46-4
Mccabe J.[5]
Oberleitner N.
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.[2]
Jung J.
7-56-2
Uchida K.
Shimizu Y.[8]
6-16-2
R32
Duckworth J.[1]
Daniel T.
2-67-626-2
Vrbensky M.
Rawat S.
6-46-736-4
Uchida K.
Mukund S.
7-656-2
Huang T.
Zhu E.
6-26-1
Janvier M.
Wu T.
4-66-37-67
Ymer E.[6]
Park U.
6-41-67-62
Mccabe J.[5]
Meng C.
6-756-47-5
Imamura M.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-1
Santillan A.
Samrej K.
6-37-613
Oberleitner N.
Ichikawa T.
6-36-4
Jung J.
Weber A.
6-756-37-66
Nishioka Y.[2]
Hazawa S.
6-46-3
Hsu Y.[7]
Lee K.
6-33-66-0
Wong C.[4]
Castelnuovo L.
6-44-67-5
Shimizu Y.[8]
Gengel M.
6-07-68
Rodionov J.[3]
Nam J.
2-67-636-2