Daniil Glinka vs Peter Makk — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
EST6
Daniil Glinka
#168ATP
1477ELO
1491Hard ELO
$127kYTD
$264kCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2025
hard
Peter Makk
HUN
Peter Makk
#564ATP
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWWW
Glinka D.
6-2 6-4
Makk P.
Glinka D.
662
Makk P.
240

Daniil Glinka defeated Peter Makk 6-2 6-4 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Glinka D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Makk P.

Makk P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Glinka D.

Serve advantage — Glinka D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Glinka D.Makk P.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Glinka D.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Makk P.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Glinka D.Makk P.
Freshness·Clear edge
81
95

Glinka D.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Makk P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[5]
Blanch D.
6-726-46-1
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[5]
Stebe C.
6-46-1
Blanch D.
Glinka D.[6]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[5]
Montes De La Torre I.
7-56-4
Stebe C.
Cassone M.
7-6136-3
Glinka D.[6]
Mitsui S.
7-56-3
Blanch D.
Clarke J.[2]
6-37-65
R16
Montes De La Torre I.
Trotter J.[1]
7-637-66
Cassone M.
Mejia N.[3]
6-35-76-3
Krueger M.[5]
Ghibaudo A.
6-26-1
Blanch D.
Martin A.[8]
6-46-4
Clarke J.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-22-66-3
Stebe C.
Tarvet O.
6-37-65
Glinka D.[6]
Perez A.
6-36-4
Mitsui S.
Wiskandt M.
6-16-736-2
R32
Montes De La Torre I.
Rosenkranz M.
6-12-0
Mitsui S.
Suresh D.
7-637-60
Krueger M.[5]
Roh H.
6-26-3
Mejia N.[3]
Thanos A.
6-47-5
Cassone M.
Soto M.
6-36-2
Tarvet O.
Ilagan A.
3-66-37-66
Perez A.
Fenty A.
6-46-3
Wiskandt M.
Borg L.
4-66-16-2
Martin A.[8]
Zink T.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Rolland D.
7-612-66-1
Clarke J.[2]
Rocha F.
6-16-4
Trotter J.[1]
Broom C.
6-41-67-64
Ghibaudo A.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-2
Blanch D.
Kotzen A.
6-46-2
Glinka D.[6]
Makk P.
6-26-4
Stebe C.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-757-626-0