Cristian Garin vs Ivan Gakhov — Lima 2 CH Round of 16

Lima 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cristian Garin
CHI3
Cristian Garin
#125ATP
1667ELO
1659Clay ELO
$365kYTD
$7.0MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2025
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#387ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Garin C.
6-3 6-3
Gakhov I.
Garin C.
662
Gakhov I.
330

Cristian Garin defeated Ivan Gakhov 6-3 6-3 in the Lima 2 CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Cristian Garin came in ranked #125.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Garin C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Garin C.

Serve advantage — Garin C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Garin C.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Garin C.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
82
Break points won·Dominant
45
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
83
59
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
43
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Garin C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gakhov I.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
8.7+274 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1384
8.1Overall Elo 1667
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1430
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.8
Surface form
4.8
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Reis Da Silva J.
7-657-63
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Guillen Meza A.
6-27-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Bueno G.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Olivieri G.
6-36-4
Guillen Meza A.
Burruchaga R.[4]
6-786-27-5
Bueno G.
Garin C.[3]
7-52-66-4
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Torres J.
7-626-767-610
R16
Guillen Meza A.
Kicker N.
4-67-56-4
Bueno G.
Barrena A.
6-31-67-67
Torres J.
Dellien Velasco M.
4-66-16-2
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Habib H.
7-53-66-4
Burruchaga R.[4]
Varillas J.
6-26-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Buse I.[5]
6-36-3
Olivieri G.
Villanueva G.
6-45-76-3
Garin C.[3]
Gakhov I.
6-36-3
R32
Dellien Velasco M.
Navone M.[1]
6-27-65
Torres J.
Prado Angelo J.
7-626-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Kolar Z.
7-56-3
Varillas J.
Gomez F.
7-653-67-63
Kicker N.
Kestelboim M.
6-36-2
Guillen Meza A.
Boyer T.[8]
1-66-26-4
Bueno G.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-46-3
Barrena A.
Roncadelli F.
6-46-4
Gakhov I.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-34-66-3
Garin C.[3]
Skatov T.
6-16-2
Buse I.[5]
Tobon M.
6-726-46-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Midon L.
7-646-3
Villanueva G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-4
Olivieri G.
Taberner C.[2]
2-67-56-4
Burruchaga R.[4]
Cecchinato M.
2-66-06-3
Habib H.
Vallejo A.
7-627-65