Marin Cilic vs Benjamin Hassan — Helsinki CH Round of 32

Helsinki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marin Cilic
CRO1
Marin Cilic
#62ATP
1800ELO
1762Hard ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2025
hard
Benjamin Hassan
LBN
Benjamin Hassan
#419ATP
1451ELO
1398Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
Cilic M.
6-4 7-5
Hassan B.
Cilic M.
672
Hassan B.
450

Marin Cilic defeated Benjamin Hassan 6-4 7-5 in the Helsinki CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marin Cilic came in ranked #62.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Hassan B.

Hassan B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve advantage — Cilic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cilic M.Hassan B.
57
Serve
—
10
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Hassan B.
1st serve in·Even
57%
53%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
69%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.2
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Hassan B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
42
Break points saved·Dominant
99
68
Break points won·Clear edge
41
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Hassan B.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.8+364 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.2Hard Elo 1398
9.8Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1451
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
4.8
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Hassan B.
Freshness·Even
97
100

Cilic M.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Hassan B.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Virtanen O.[6]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Kypson P.[5]
Travaglia S.
7-653-66-2
Virtanen O.[6]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Zeppieri G.[7]
6-37-5
Virtanen O.[6]
Cilic M.[1]
7-56-4
Travaglia S.
Nardi L.[2]
6-21-66-1
Kypson P.[5]
Giustino L.
6-46-2
R16
Giustino L.
Coppejans K.
7-657-65
Cilic M.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-24-67-5
Virtanen O.[6]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-2
Zeppieri G.[7]
Rodesch C.
4-66-26-3
Kypson P.[5]
Hemery C.
3-66-27-65
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Dodig M.
6-46-2
Travaglia S.
Vasa E.
6-45-77-5
Nardi L.[2]
Durasovic V.
6-26-2
R32
Kypson P.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
5-76-16-3
Virtanen O.[6]
Onclin G.
6-17-66
Dodig M.
Lajovic D.[4]
6-37-63
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Gojo B.
3-67-626-4
Rodesch C.
Engel J.
6-46-736-4
Zeppieri G.[7]
Paldanius O.
7-626-2
Giustino L.
Droguet T.
6-26-4
Vasa E.
Mikrut L.[8]
7-56-1
Travaglia S.
Parker S.
6-36-4
Durasovic V.
Cina F.
7-666-4
Nardi L.[2]
Butvilas E.
6-46-2
Hemery C.
Fatic N.
6-37-64
Napolitano S.
Galarneau A.
6-26-736-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Neumayer L.
6-47-63
Coppejans K.
Holt B.[3]
6-43-67-5
Cilic M.[1]
Hassan B.
6-47-5