James Trotter vs Charles Broom — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN1
James Trotter
#420ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2025
hard
GBR
Charles Broom
#285ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLW
Trotter J.
6-4 1-6 7-6
Broom C.
Trotter J.
61772
Broom C.
46641

James Trotter defeated Charles Broom 6-4 1-6 7-6 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: James Trotter closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trotter J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trotter J.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.3
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (66 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trotter J.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
12
Break points saved·Dominant
90
56
Break points won·Even
2
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
42
Tiebreaks·Even
7
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trotter J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 33 days (−0.7)
Broom C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Hard Elo 1380
Surface ELO
5.4+16 Hard Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1414
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1409
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trotter J.Broom C.
Freshness·
82
—

Trotter J.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[5]
Blanch D.
6-726-46-1
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[5]
Stebe C.
6-46-1
Blanch D.
Glinka D.[6]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[5]
Montes De La Torre I.
7-56-4
Stebe C.
Cassone M.
7-6136-3
Glinka D.[6]
Mitsui S.
7-56-3
Blanch D.
Clarke J.[2]
6-37-65
R16
Montes De La Torre I.
Trotter J.[1]
7-637-66
Cassone M.
Mejia N.[3]
6-35-76-3
Krueger M.[5]
Ghibaudo A.
6-26-1
Blanch D.
Martin A.[8]
6-46-4
Clarke J.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-22-66-3
Stebe C.
Tarvet O.
6-37-65
Glinka D.[6]
Perez A.
6-36-4
Mitsui S.
Wiskandt M.
6-16-736-2
R32
Montes De La Torre I.
Rosenkranz M.
6-12-0
Mitsui S.
Suresh D.
7-637-60
Krueger M.[5]
Roh H.
6-26-3
Mejia N.[3]
Thanos A.
6-47-5
Cassone M.
Soto M.
6-36-2
Tarvet O.
Ilagan A.
3-66-37-66
Perez A.
Fenty A.
6-46-3
Wiskandt M.
Borg L.
4-66-16-2
Martin A.[8]
Zink T.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Rolland D.
7-612-66-1
Clarke J.[2]
Rocha F.
6-16-4
Trotter J.[1]
Broom C.
6-41-67-64
Ghibaudo A.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-2
Blanch D.
Kotzen A.
6-46-2
Glinka D.[6]
Makk P.
6-26-4
Stebe C.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-757-626-0