Francisco Rocha vs Leo Borg — Knoxville CH Qualifying Round 2

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
POR12
Francisco Rocha
#854ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2025
hard
SWE3
Leo Borg
#522ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWLW
Rocha F.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Borg L.
Rocha F.
6362
Borg L.
3631

Francisco Rocha defeated Leo Borg 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Knoxville CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Francisco Rocha closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rocha F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Borg L.

Borg L.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Rocha F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rocha F.Borg L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
53%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rocha F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Borg L.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.8
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
9.1
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Wiskandt M.[2]
Williams C.[9]
6-36-4
Cassone M.[1]
Moreno A.
6-26-0
Rocha F.[12]
Borg L.[3]
6-33-66-3
Mitsui S.[10]
Smith K.[4]
6-26-4
Makk P.
Kennedy J.
4-66-36-2
Suresh D.[6]
Vandecasteele Q.[8]
7-53-66-3
Q1
Cassone M.[1]
Brymer G.
6-36-1
Moreno A.
Martinez Gomez P.[11]
6-36-3
Wiskandt M.[2]
Willwerth B.
6-737-617-65
Williams C.[9]
Lalami Laaroussi Y.
6-26-1
Borg L.[3]
Johnson S.
6-36-2
Rocha F.[12]
Grumet G.
7-616-2
Smith K.[4]
Delgado A.
7-636-4
Mitsui S.[10]
Luis T.
6-16-2
Kennedy J.
Brown P.
6-46-3
Makk P.
Kirchheimer S.[7]
7-656-3
Suresh D.[6]
Pow L.
6-22-67-64
Vandecasteele Q.[8]
Schachter N.
6-36-3