Ethan Quinn vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Paris Masters Qualifying Round 2

Paris Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Ethan Quinn
USA12
Ethan Quinn
#47ATP
1804ELO
1767Hard ELO
$724kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#54ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Quinn E.
6-3 7-6
Van De Zandschulp B.
Quinn E.
6772
Van De Zandschulp B.
3640

Ethan Quinn defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-3 7-6 in the Paris Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ethan Quinn came in ranked #47.

Key context

  • Match story: Ethan Quinn closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Quinn E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Quinn E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Quinn E.Van De Zandschulp B.
37
Serve
41
21
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Quinn E.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
6.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 79). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Quinn E.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
71
77
Break points saved·Even
95
98
Break points won·Dominant
19
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
98
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Quinn E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+57 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1711
5.6Overall Elo 1804
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1743
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
3.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
5.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Quinn E.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·Even
91
87

Quinn E.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 19 km/hHumidity 82%
Q2
Etcheverry T.[4]
De Jong J.
6-26-3
Korda S.[2]
Royer V.[10]
6-25-76-4
Quinn E.[12]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-64
Vukic A.
Opelka R.[5]
W/O
Comesana F.[7]
Goffin D.
6-10-0
Fearnley J.
Hanfmann Y.
6-46-2
Dzumhur D.[6]
Kovacevic A.[8]
6-726-37-67
Q1
Opelka R.[5]
Bellucci M.
6-36-4
Korda S.[2]
Kopriva V.
6-27-5
Comesana F.[7]
Van Assche L.
7-56-1
Royer V.[10]
Herbert P.
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Halys Q.
4-66-36-1
Etcheverry T.[4]
Martinez P.
6-26-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Brooksby J.[1]
4-66-36-3
Vukic A.
Walton A.[14]
3-66-26-4
De Jong J.
Majchrzak K.[11]
4-67-657-64
Quinn E.[12]
Blanchet U.
6-26-3
Goffin D.
Medjedovic H.[9]
7-57-5
Hanfmann Y.
Mannarino A.[3]
6-36-2
Kovacevic A.[8]
Jacquet K.
3-67-57-63
Fearnley J.
Arnaldi M.[13]
7-56-2