Dan Martin vs Maik Steiner — Charlottesville CH Qualifying Round 1

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
CAN5
Dan Martin
1313ELO
1276Hard ELO
27 yrs · 175 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
GER
Maik Steiner
#705ATP
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
Martin D.
7-5 6-0
Steiner M.
Martin D.
762
Steiner M.
500

Dan Martin defeated Maik Steiner 7-5 6-0 in the Charlottesville CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Steiner M.

Steiner M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Martin D.

Serve advantage — Steiner M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martin D.Steiner M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Steiner M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
2.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martin D.Steiner M.
Freshness·
98
—

Martin D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Suresh D.[8]
Shah A.[3]
7-657-5
Kingsley C.[9]
Banerjee S.[1]
6-776-26-4
Boulais J.
Azkara A.
6-26-4
Wiskandt M.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-17-65
Smith K.[11]
Martin D.[5]
6-46-2
Kasnikowski M.
Arutiunian E.[12]
6-46-4
Q1
Kingsley C.[9]
Delgado A.
6-36-2
Banerjee S.[1]
Rice K.
6-37-5
Boulais J.
Svajda T.[2]
6-46-4
Suresh D.[8]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-2
Wiskandt M.[4]
Kumar P.
6-24-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Artnak B.[7]
6-11-66-3
Arutiunian E.[12]
Kim J.
6-47-65
Azkara A.
Borg L.[10]
7-56-3
Shah A.[3]
Ganesan A.
6-31-0
Martin D.[5]
Steiner M.
7-56-0
Smith K.[11]
Schachter N.
6-46-3
Kasnikowski M.
Winter E.[6]
6-36-4