Daniil Glinka vs Patrick Zahraj — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
EST
Daniil Glinka
#167ATP
1477ELO
1491Hard ELO
$127kYTD
$264kCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
GER
Patrick Zahraj
#425ATP
1331ELO
1322Hard ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Glinka D.
7-6 6-2
Zahraj P.
Glinka D.
7762
Zahraj P.
6420

Daniil Glinka defeated Patrick Zahraj 7-6 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniil Glinka closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Glinka D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zahraj P.

Zahraj P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Glinka D.

Serve advantage — Glinka D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Glinka D.Zahraj P.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.4
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Glinka D.Zahraj P.
Clutch Rating·Even
23
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
69
Break points won·Even
9
10
Deciding sets·Even
6
7
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Glinka D.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Zahraj P.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.9+169 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1322
7.2Overall Elo 1477
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
5.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Glinka D.Zahraj P.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
80

Glinka D.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Zahraj P.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Jodar R.[7]
Damm M.[6]
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Damm M.[6]
Rosenkranz M.
7-636-4
Jodar R.[7]
Monday J.[8]
6-44-2
Quarter-finals
Rosenkranz M.
Tarvet O.
6-16-0
Damm M.[6]
Glinka D.
6-736-46-4
Monday J.[8]
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Jodar R.[7]
Dietrich D.
7-56-3
R16
Rosenkranz M.
Hijikata R.[1]
6-36-4
Glinka D.
Zahraj P.
7-646-2
Damm M.[6]
Smith K.
6-17-5
Krueger M.
Suresh D.
7-654-66-3
Jodar R.[7]
Purtseladze S.
6-46-0
Tarvet O.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-47-63
Dietrich D.
Clarke J.[4]
7-666-2
Monday J.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-716-1
R32
Hijikata R.[1]
Soto M.
4-67-56-3
Rosenkranz M.
Martin A.
6-44-66-3
Montes De La Torre I.
Ilagan A.
5-77-616-4
Tarvet O.
Mejia N.[5]
6-46-2
Glinka D.
Kypson P.[3]
6-36-3
Zahraj P.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-3
Smith K.
Blanch D.
4-66-36-2
Damm M.[6]
Broom C.
6-36-3
Jodar R.[7]
Cassone M.
6-47-5
Purtseladze S.
Wiskandt M.
7-57-64
Clarke J.[4]
Zink T.
6-26-4
Monday J.[8]
Karki R.
6-37-5
Krueger M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-757-65
Suresh D.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Dietrich D.
Perez A.
6-36-4