Rafael Jodar vs Martin Damm — Charlottesville CH Final

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Rafael Jodar
ESP7
Rafael Jodar
#26ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
Martin Damm
USA6
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Jodar R.
6-3 7-6
Damm M.
Jodar R.
6772
Damm M.
3620

Rafael Jodar defeated Martin Damm 6-3 7-6 in the Charlottesville CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Rafael Jodar came in ranked #26.

Key context

  • Match story: Rafael Jodar closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jodar R.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jodar R.Damm M.
18
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jodar R.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
33%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
12.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jodar R.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
26
Break points saved·Even
91
93
Break points won·Dominant
71
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
5
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
93
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jodar R.
8.1
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Damm M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+216 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1657
8.7Overall Elo 1999
ELO gap
1.3Overall Elo 1706
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.0
Surface form
6.9
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
0.4
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jodar R.Damm M.
Freshness·Slight edge
82
91

Jodar R.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Damm M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Jodar R.[7]
Damm M.[6]
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Damm M.[6]
Rosenkranz M.
7-636-4
Jodar R.[7]
Monday J.[8]
6-44-2
Quarter-finals
Rosenkranz M.
Tarvet O.
6-16-0
Damm M.[6]
Glinka D.
6-736-46-4
Monday J.[8]
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Jodar R.[7]
Dietrich D.
7-56-3
R16
Rosenkranz M.
Hijikata R.[1]
6-36-4
Glinka D.
Zahraj P.
7-646-2
Damm M.[6]
Smith K.
6-17-5
Krueger M.
Suresh D.
7-654-66-3
Jodar R.[7]
Purtseladze S.
6-46-0
Tarvet O.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-47-63
Dietrich D.
Clarke J.[4]
7-666-2
Monday J.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-716-1
R32
Hijikata R.[1]
Soto M.
4-67-56-3
Rosenkranz M.
Martin A.
6-44-66-3
Montes De La Torre I.
Ilagan A.
5-77-616-4
Tarvet O.
Mejia N.[5]
6-46-2
Glinka D.
Kypson P.[3]
6-36-3
Zahraj P.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-3
Smith K.
Blanch D.
4-66-36-2
Damm M.[6]
Broom C.
6-36-3
Jodar R.[7]
Cassone M.
6-47-5
Purtseladze S.
Wiskandt M.
7-57-64
Clarke J.[4]
Zink T.
6-26-4
Monday J.[8]
Karki R.
6-37-5
Krueger M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-757-65
Suresh D.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Dietrich D.
Perez A.
6-36-4