Jay Clarke vs Tyler Zink — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR4
Jay Clarke
#246ATP
1458ELO
1421Hard ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
USA
Tyler Zink
#330ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
Clarke J.
6-2 6-4
Zink T.
Clarke J.
662
Zink T.
240

Jay Clarke defeated Tyler Zink 6-2 6-4 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Clarke J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Zink T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Clarke J.Zink T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Clarke J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Zink T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+70 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1351
5.5Overall Elo 1458
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1371
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
5.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Clarke J.Zink T.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
79

Clarke J.: 19 days rest · Zink T.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Jodar R.[7]
Damm M.[6]
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Damm M.[6]
Rosenkranz M.
7-636-4
Jodar R.[7]
Monday J.[8]
6-44-2
Quarter-finals
Rosenkranz M.
Tarvet O.
6-16-0
Damm M.[6]
Glinka D.
6-736-46-4
Monday J.[8]
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Jodar R.[7]
Dietrich D.
7-56-3
R16
Rosenkranz M.
Hijikata R.[1]
6-36-4
Glinka D.
Zahraj P.
7-646-2
Damm M.[6]
Smith K.
6-17-5
Krueger M.
Suresh D.
7-654-66-3
Jodar R.[7]
Purtseladze S.
6-46-0
Tarvet O.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-47-63
Dietrich D.
Clarke J.[4]
7-666-2
Monday J.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-716-1
R32
Hijikata R.[1]
Soto M.
4-67-56-3
Rosenkranz M.
Martin A.
6-44-66-3
Montes De La Torre I.
Ilagan A.
5-77-616-4
Tarvet O.
Mejia N.[5]
6-46-2
Glinka D.
Kypson P.[3]
6-36-3
Zahraj P.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-3
Smith K.
Blanch D.
4-66-36-2
Damm M.[6]
Broom C.
6-36-3
Jodar R.[7]
Cassone M.
6-47-5
Purtseladze S.
Wiskandt M.
7-57-64
Clarke J.[4]
Zink T.
6-26-4
Monday J.[8]
Karki R.
6-37-5
Krueger M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-757-65
Suresh D.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Dietrich D.
Perez A.
6-36-4