Ignacio Buse vs Juan Bautista Torres — Lima Los Inkas CH Round of 16

Lima Los Inkas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ignacio Buse
PER4
Ignacio Buse
#34ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
clay
Juan Bautista Torres
ARG
Juan Bautista Torres
#290ATP
1369ELO
1357Clay ELO
24 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWWLW
Buse I.
6-3 7-5
Torres J.
Buse I.
672
Torres J.
350

Ignacio Buse defeated Juan Bautista Torres 6-3 7-5 in the Lima Los Inkas CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #34.

Key context

  • Match story: Ignacio Buse closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Buse I.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Torres J.

Torres J.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Buse I.Torres J.
41
Serve
—
14
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Buse I.Torres J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
61%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
46%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
1.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Buse I.Torres J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
8
Break points saved·Dominant
87
14
Break points won·Dominant
28
68
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
4
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Buse I.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Torres J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+430 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1357
8.9Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1369
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Buse I.Torres J.
Freshness·Slight edge
91
100

Buse I.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Torres J.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Navone M.[1]
Cecchinato M.
6-45-76-4
Semi-finals
Navone M.[1]
Guillen Meza A.
6-46-1
Cecchinato M.
Boyer T.[6]
7-673-66-3
Quarter-finals
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.[4]
6-24-66-3
Navone M.[1]
Barrena A.[8]
6-06-3
Cecchinato M.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-47-65
Boyer T.[6]
Kolar Z.
6-42-66-3
R16
Cecchinato M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
7-647-65
Navone M.[1]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-0
Guillen Meza A.
Andrade A.
6-26-2
Kolar Z.
Midon L.
6-36-3
Huertas Del Pino A.
Zarate C.
6-46-4
Boyer T.[6]
Kicker N.
3-66-26-4
Buse I.[4]
Torres J.
6-37-5
Barrena A.[8]
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
R32
Zarate C.
Cerundolo J.[2]
1-64-1
Kolar Z.
Varillas J.
7-646-757-63
Navone M.[1]
Olivieri G.
6-36-1
Jorda Sanchis D.
Kestelboim M.
6-36-2
Buse I.[4]
Roncadelli F.
6-33-66-2
Torres J.
Tobon M.
6-16-2
Kicker N.
Ingildsen J.
6-36-1
Midon L.
Gomez F.[9]
4-67-646-4
Huertas Del Pino A.
Cavallo F.
6-36-766-2
Cecchinato M.
Justo G.
6-36-756-1
Barrena A.[8]
Collarini A.
7-646-4
Burruchaga R.[5]
Rubini A.
6-06-3
Villanueva G.
Skatov T.
6-36-1
Guillen Meza A.
Bueno G.
7-663-1
Andrade A.
Habib H.[7]
7-647-62
Boyer T.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-627-64