Cristina Bucsa vs Maya Joint — Hong Kong Semi-final

Hong Kong · WTA · Semi-final
Cristina Bucsa
ESP
Cristina Bucsa
#35WTA
1722ELO
1710Hard ELO
$900kYTD
$5.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
Maya Joint
AUS5
Maya Joint
#87WTA
1659ELO
1657Hard ELO
$391kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
20 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
Bucsa C.
6-3 6-1
Joint M.
Bucsa C.
662
Joint M.
310

Cristina Bucsa defeated Maya Joint 6-3 6-1 in the Hong Kong semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Cristina Bucsa came in ranked #35, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bucsa C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Joint M.

Joint M.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bucsa C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bucsa C.Joint M.
22
Serve
17
52
Return
45

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bucsa C.Joint M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
47%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
51%
Aces / match·Even
1.1
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bucsa C.Joint M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
60
77
Break points saved·Even
79
76
Break points won·Slight edge
93
99
Deciding sets·Slight edge
68
77
Tiebreaks·
27
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bucsa C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Joint M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+53 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Hard Elo 1657
4.9Overall Elo 1722
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1659
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bucsa C.Joint M.
Freshness·
—
91

Joint M.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mboko V.[3]
Bucsa C.
7-56-796-2
Semi-finals
Mboko V.[3]
Fernandez L.[2]
2-66-36-2
Bucsa C.
Joint M.[5]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Bucsa C.
Bencic B.[1]
W/O
Mboko V.[3]
Kalinskaya A.[6]
6-13-1
Joint M.[5]
Sakatsume H.
6-42-66-4
Fernandez L.[2]
Cirstea S.[7]
6-46-4
R16
Bucsa C.
Arango E.[8]
6-26-4
Mboko V.[3]
Eala A.
3-66-36-4
Cirstea S.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
4-66-46-3
Fernandez L.[2]
Lys E.
6-46-1
Bencic B.[1]
Wang Y.
6-26-2
Sakatsume H.
Chong E.
6-26-1
Joint M.[5]
Morvayova V.
6-16-4
Kalinskaya A.[6]
Zhang S.
6-16-1
R32
Eala A.
Boulter K.
6-42-1
Bucsa C.
Ma Y.
6-16-2
Arango E.[8]
Uchijima M.
6-736-16-4
Chong E.
Lamens S.
6-36-4
Zhang S.
Erjavec V.
6-26-2
Mboko V.[3]
Gibson T.
6-726-16-4
Joint M.[5]
Sevastova A.
2-66-46-3
Bencic B.[1]
Sasnovich A.
6-36-4
Wang Y.
Inglis M.
6-46-766-3
Morvayova V.
Wong H.
6-16-0
Kalinskaya A.[6]
Rakhimova K.
6-46-4
Cirstea S.[7]
Galfi D.
7-56-3
Fernandez L.[2]
Wang X.
6-16-4
Tomljanovic A.
Kobori M.
7-56-2
Lys E.
Sidorova K.
6-06-3
Sakatsume H.
Kenin S.[4]
6-26-1