Learner Tien vs Nuno Borges — Paris Masters Round of 64

Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Tien L.
6-2 7-6
Borges N.
Tien L.
6792
Borges N.
2670

Learner Tien defeated Nuno Borges 6-2 7-6 in the Paris Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Learner Tien extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Learner Tien closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-19Australian OpenR32hardLearner Tien7-6(9) 6-4 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Borges N.
32
Serve
36
67
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Borges N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.1
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
90
77
Break points saved·Even
97
98
Break points won·Dominant
83
54
Deciding sets·Even
100
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
100
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 26 days (−0.3)
Borges N.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+190 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Hard Elo 1714
7.2Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1769
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Borges N.
Freshness·Even
91
93

Tien L.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Borges N.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 19 km/hHumidity 82%
Final
Sinner J.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[2]
Zverev A.[3]
6-06-1
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Bublik A.[13]
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Vacherot V.
6-26-2
Bublik A.[13]
De Minaur A.[6]
6-756-47-5
Sinner J.[2]
Shelton B.[5]
6-36-3
Zverev A.[3]
Medvedev D.[11]
2-66-37-65
R16
Shelton B.[5]
Rublev A.[12]
7-666-3
De Minaur A.[6]
Khachanov K.[10]
6-26-2
Zverev A.[3]
Davidovich Fokina A.[15]
6-26-4
Sinner J.[2]
Cerundolo F.
7-56-1
Medvedev D.[11]
Sonego L.
3-67-656-4
Vacherot V.
Norrie C.
7-646-4
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Altmaier D.
3-66-36-2
Bublik A.[13]
Fritz T.[4]
7-656-2
R32
Medvedev D.[11]
Dimitrov G.
W/O
Shelton B.[5]
Cobolli F.
7-646-3
Cerundolo F.
Kecmanovic M.
7-51-67-64
Sinner J.[2]
Bergs Z.
6-46-2
Rublev A.[12]
Tien L.
6-46-4
De Minaur A.[6]
Diallo G.
7-684-66-3
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Muller A.
5-77-657-64
Vacherot V.
Rinderknech A.
6-796-36-4
Altmaier D.
Ruud C.[8]
6-37-5
Davidovich Fokina A.[15]
Cazaux A.
7-656-4
Sonego L.
Musetti L.[7]
3-66-36-1
Norrie C.
Alcaraz C.[1]
4-66-36-4
Fritz T.[4]
Vukic A.
7-646-2
Bublik A.[13]
Moutet C.
6-37-5
Zverev A.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-756-17-5
Khachanov K.[10]
Fonseca J.
6-13-66-3
R64
Cazaux A.
Darderi L.
7-657-64
Rinderknech A.
Marozsan F.
7-657-64
Vacherot V.
Lehecka J.[14]
6-16-3
Muller A.
Nakashima B.
6-27-5
Bublik A.[13]
Popyrin A.
6-46-3
Bergs Z.
Michelsen A.
6-32-66-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Etcheverry T.
7-56-3
Diallo G.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-4
Fonseca J.
Shapovalov D.
5-76-46-3
Dimitrov G.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-656-1
Medvedev D.[11]
Munar J.
6-16-3
Tien L.
Borges N.
6-27-67
Cerundolo F.
Dzumhur D.
6-36-3
Sonego L.
Korda S.
6-26-3
Cobolli F.
Machac T.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.
Giron M.
6-27-65
Vukic A.
Atmane T.
6-42-66-4
Norrie C.
Baez S.
6-36-4
Rublev A.[12]
Fearnley J.
6-16-4
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Comesana F.
6-726-36-3
Kecmanovic M.
Kovacevic A.
6-41-67-62
Moutet C.
Opelka R.
3-67-56-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[15]
Royer V.
4-66-16-4
Khachanov K.[10]
Quinn E.
6-16-1