Keegan Smith vs Darwin Blanch — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Keegan Smith
#204ATP
1421ELO
1395Hard ELO
28 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
USA
Darwin Blanch
#225ATP
1551ELO
1483Hard ELO
18 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Smith K.
4-6 6-3 6-2
Blanch D.
Smith K.
4662
Blanch D.
6321

Keegan Smith defeated Darwin Blanch 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smith K.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Blanch D.

Blanch D.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Smith K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith K.Blanch D.
1st serve in·Clear edge
73%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
61%
Aces / match·Even
6.5
6.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (52 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith K.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Blanch D.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.8Hard Elo 1395
Surface ELO
7.2+89 Hard Elo edge
2.0Overall Elo 1421
ELO gap
8.0Overall Elo 1551
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
4.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.3
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith K.Blanch D.
Freshness·Slight edge
81
70

Smith K.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Blanch D.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 74 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Jodar R.[7]
Damm M.[6]
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Damm M.[6]
Rosenkranz M.
7-636-4
Jodar R.[7]
Monday J.[8]
6-44-2
Quarter-finals
Rosenkranz M.
Tarvet O.
6-16-0
Damm M.[6]
Glinka D.
6-736-46-4
Monday J.[8]
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Jodar R.[7]
Dietrich D.
7-56-3
R16
Rosenkranz M.
Hijikata R.[1]
6-36-4
Glinka D.
Zahraj P.
7-646-2
Damm M.[6]
Smith K.
6-17-5
Krueger M.
Suresh D.
7-654-66-3
Jodar R.[7]
Purtseladze S.
6-46-0
Tarvet O.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-47-63
Dietrich D.
Clarke J.[4]
7-666-2
Monday J.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-716-1
R32
Hijikata R.[1]
Soto M.
4-67-56-3
Rosenkranz M.
Martin A.
6-44-66-3
Montes De La Torre I.
Ilagan A.
5-77-616-4
Tarvet O.
Mejia N.[5]
6-46-2
Glinka D.
Kypson P.[3]
6-36-3
Zahraj P.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-3
Smith K.
Blanch D.
4-66-36-2
Damm M.[6]
Broom C.
6-36-3
Jodar R.[7]
Cassone M.
6-47-5
Purtseladze S.
Wiskandt M.
7-57-64
Clarke J.[4]
Zink T.
6-26-4
Monday J.[8]
Karki R.
6-37-5
Krueger M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-757-65
Suresh D.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Dietrich D.
Perez A.
6-36-4