Cristina Bucsa vs Belinda Bencic — Hong Kong Quarter-final

Hong Kong · WTA · Quarter-final
Cristina Bucsa
ESP
Cristina Bucsa
#35WTA
1722ELO
1710Hard ELO
$900kYTD
$5.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
—
Sets
Walkover
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
Belinda Bencic
SUI1
Belinda Bencic
#11WTA
1989ELO
1952Hard ELO
$1.8MYTD
$17MCAREER
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWLL
Bucsa C.
vs
Bencic B.

Cristina Bucsa advanced past Belinda Bencic via walkover in the Hong Kong quarter-final. Cristina Bucsa extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-14CincinnatiR64hardCristina Bucsa4-6 6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Bucsa C.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bencic B.

Bencic B.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bucsa C.

Serve advantage — Bencic B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bucsa C.Bencic B.
22
Serve
57
52
Return
55

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bucsa C.Bencic B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bucsa C.Bencic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
60
89
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
95
Break points won·Even
93
94
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bucsa C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Bencic B.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Hard Elo 1710
Surface ELO
7.8+242 Hard Elo edge
2.1Overall Elo 1722
ELO gap
7.9Overall Elo 1989
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.9
Surface form
8.5
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
0.0
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bucsa C.Bencic B.
Freshness·
—
72

Bencic B.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mboko V.[3]
Bucsa C.
7-56-796-2
Semi-finals
Mboko V.[3]
Fernandez L.[2]
2-66-36-2
Bucsa C.
Joint M.[5]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Bucsa C.
Bencic B.[1]
W/O
Mboko V.[3]
Kalinskaya A.[6]
6-13-1
Joint M.[5]
Sakatsume H.
6-42-66-4
Fernandez L.[2]
Cirstea S.[7]
6-46-4
R16
Bucsa C.
Arango E.[8]
6-26-4
Mboko V.[3]
Eala A.
3-66-36-4
Cirstea S.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
4-66-46-3
Fernandez L.[2]
Lys E.
6-46-1
Bencic B.[1]
Wang Y.
6-26-2
Sakatsume H.
Chong E.
6-26-1
Joint M.[5]
Morvayova V.
6-16-4
Kalinskaya A.[6]
Zhang S.
6-16-1
R32
Eala A.
Boulter K.
6-42-1
Bucsa C.
Ma Y.
6-16-2
Arango E.[8]
Uchijima M.
6-736-16-4
Chong E.
Lamens S.
6-36-4
Zhang S.
Erjavec V.
6-26-2
Mboko V.[3]
Gibson T.
6-726-16-4
Joint M.[5]
Sevastova A.
2-66-46-3
Bencic B.[1]
Sasnovich A.
6-36-4
Wang Y.
Inglis M.
6-46-766-3
Morvayova V.
Wong H.
6-16-0
Kalinskaya A.[6]
Rakhimova K.
6-46-4
Cirstea S.[7]
Galfi D.
7-56-3
Fernandez L.[2]
Wang X.
6-16-4
Tomljanovic A.
Kobori M.
7-56-2
Lys E.
Sidorova K.
6-06-3
Sakatsume H.
Kenin S.[4]
6-26-1