Samir Banerjee vs Keegan Rice — Charlottesville CH Qualifying Round 1

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA1
Samir Banerjee
#408ATP
1384ELO
1361Hard ELO
22 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
CAN
Keegan Rice
#1037ATP
20 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
Banerjee S.
6-3 7-5
Rice K.
Banerjee S.
672
Rice K.
350

Samir Banerjee defeated Keegan Rice 6-3 7-5 in the Charlottesville CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Banerjee S.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rice K.

Rice K.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Banerjee S.

Serve advantage — Banerjee S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Banerjee S.Rice K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Banerjee S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rice K.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 105 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
2.8
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Banerjee S.Rice K.
Freshness·
100
—

Banerjee S.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Suresh D.[8]
Shah A.[3]
7-657-5
Kingsley C.[9]
Banerjee S.[1]
6-776-26-4
Boulais J.
Azkara A.
6-26-4
Wiskandt M.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-17-65
Smith K.[11]
Martin D.[5]
6-46-2
Kasnikowski M.
Arutiunian E.[12]
6-46-4
Q1
Kingsley C.[9]
Delgado A.
6-36-2
Banerjee S.[1]
Rice K.
6-37-5
Boulais J.
Svajda T.[2]
6-46-4
Suresh D.[8]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-2
Wiskandt M.[4]
Kumar P.
6-24-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Artnak B.[7]
6-11-66-3
Arutiunian E.[12]
Kim J.
6-47-65
Azkara A.
Borg L.[10]
7-56-3
Shah A.[3]
Ganesan A.
6-31-0
Martin D.[5]
Steiner M.
7-56-0
Smith K.[11]
Schachter N.
6-46-3
Kasnikowski M.
Winter E.[6]
6-36-4