Mats Rosenkranz vs Jordan Thompson — Sioux Falls CH Quarter-final

Sioux Falls CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#352ATP
1454ELO
1424Hard ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
Jordan Thompson
AUS1
Jordan Thompson
#156ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
Rosenkranz M.
7-5 1-0
Thompson J.
Rosenkranz M.
71–
Thompson J.
50–

Mats Rosenkranz advanced when Jordan Thompson retired 7-5 1-0 in the Sioux Falls CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosenkranz M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosenkranz M.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
55%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
66%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
8.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (56 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosenkranz M.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
31
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
97
Break points won·Clear edge
1
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosenkranz M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Thompson J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
1.1Hard Elo 1424
Surface ELO
8.9+308 Hard Elo edge
1.0Overall Elo 1454
ELO gap
9.0Overall Elo 1772
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Monday J.
6-727-647-5
Semi-finals
Monday J.
Rosenkranz M.
6-47-64
Kypson P.[5]
Ghibaudo A.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Rosenkranz M.
Thompson J.[1]
7-51-0
Kypson P.[5]
Hijikata R.[3]
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-646-4
Monday J.
Martin A.
6-36-3
R16
Martin A.
Draxl L.[4]
6-17-5
Monday J.
Perez A.
7-56-3
Thompson J.[1]
Arutiunian E.
7-57-62
Rosenkranz M.
Cassone M.[6]
6-07-5
Kypson P.[5]
Jodar R.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Ilagan A.
7-627-5
Hijikata R.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-636-2
Ghibaudo A.
Fenty A.
7-56-4
R32
Ilagan A.
Holt B.[2]
4-3
Thompson J.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Boulais J.
6-16-4
Cassone M.[6]
Krueger M.
7-653-66-2
Draxl L.[4]
Blanch D.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Monday J.
Zheng M.[7]
2-66-46-4
Kypson P.[5]
Tarvet O.
6-24-66-3
Jodar R.
Purtseladze S.
6-47-5
Banerjee S.
Mchugh A.
6-36-4
Arutiunian E.
Zahraj P.
6-16-2
Fenty A.
Smith K.
4-67-647-63
Ghibaudo A.
Clarke J.[8]
2-66-27-5
Damm M.
Martin D.
6-26-4
Hijikata R.[3]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-0
Martin A.
Shah A.
7-651-66-3