Alfredo Perez vs Cannon Kingsley — Sioux Falls CH Round of 32

Sioux Falls CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Alfredo Perez
#610ATP
1372ELO
1333Hard ELO
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#429ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Perez A.
6-4 6-4
Kingsley C.
Perez A.
662
Kingsley C.
440

Alfredo Perez defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-4 6-4 in the Sioux Falls CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Alfredo Perez edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Perez A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Perez A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Perez A.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 52). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Perez A.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Even
23
21
Break points saved·Even
72
74
Break points won·Clear edge
1
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
47
27
Tiebreaks·Even
21
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Perez A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Kingsley C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.9Hard Elo 1333
Surface ELO
5.1+11 Hard Elo edge
5.4Overall Elo 1372
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1342
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
5.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Monday J.
6-727-647-5
Semi-finals
Monday J.
Rosenkranz M.
6-47-64
Kypson P.[5]
Ghibaudo A.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Rosenkranz M.
Thompson J.[1]
7-51-0
Kypson P.[5]
Hijikata R.[3]
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-646-4
Monday J.
Martin A.
6-36-3
R16
Martin A.
Draxl L.[4]
6-17-5
Monday J.
Perez A.
7-56-3
Thompson J.[1]
Arutiunian E.
7-57-62
Rosenkranz M.
Cassone M.[6]
6-07-5
Kypson P.[5]
Jodar R.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Ilagan A.
7-627-5
Hijikata R.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-636-2
Ghibaudo A.
Fenty A.
7-56-4
R32
Ilagan A.
Holt B.[2]
4-3
Thompson J.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Boulais J.
6-16-4
Cassone M.[6]
Krueger M.
7-653-66-2
Draxl L.[4]
Blanch D.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Monday J.
Zheng M.[7]
2-66-46-4
Kypson P.[5]
Tarvet O.
6-24-66-3
Jodar R.
Purtseladze S.
6-47-5
Banerjee S.
Mchugh A.
6-36-4
Arutiunian E.
Zahraj P.
6-16-2
Fenty A.
Smith K.
4-67-647-63
Ghibaudo A.
Clarke J.[8]
2-66-27-5
Damm M.
Martin D.
6-26-4
Hijikata R.[3]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-0
Martin A.
Shah A.
7-651-66-3