Xiyu Wang vs Francesca Jones — Guangzhou Round of 32

Guangzhou · WTA · Round of 32
Xiyu Wang
CHN
Xiyu Wang
#89WTA
1772ELO
1724Hard ELO
25 yrs · 182 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
Francesca Jones
GBR7
Francesca Jones
#123WTA
1619ELO
1581Hard ELO
25 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLWL
Wang X.
6-4 6-4
Jones F.
Wang X.
662
Jones F.
440

Xiyu Wang defeated Francesca Jones 6-4 6-4 in the Guangzhou round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Xiyu Wang came in ranked #89, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Xiyu Wang edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jones F.

Jones F.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wang X.Jones F.
—
Serve
3
—
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Jones F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.3
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Jones F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
78
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
80
Break points won·Slight edge
91
96
Deciding sets·Even
70
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
25
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Jones F.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.2+142 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1581
5.8Overall Elo 1772
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1619
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
7.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wang X.Jones F.
Freshness·Dominant
98
70

Wang X.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Jones F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 69 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Li A.[2]
Sun L.
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Li A.[2]
Zhang S.
5-2
Sun L.
Liu C.
6-07-63
Quarter-finals
Sun L.
Mcnally C.
3-66-36-4
Zhang S.
Volynets K.
7-655-77-5
Liu C.
Seidel E.
4-66-06-4
Li A.[2]
Cocciaretto E.
6-36-4
R16
Volynets K.
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
6-36-3
Zhang S.
Erjavec V.
3-66-36-2
Mcnally C.
Tomljanovic A.
6-44-66-3
Sun L.
Wang Y.
6-36-1
Liu C.
Bondar A.
6-36-4
Seidel E.
Putintseva Y.[6]
6-36-2
Cocciaretto E.
Wang X.
6-32-66-3
Li A.[2]
Osorio C.
7-56-2
R32
Sun L.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[1]
7-637-62
Wang Y.
Rakhimova K.
6-26-4
Bondar A.
Guo H.
6-33-67-64
Volynets K.
Kawa K.
4-66-26-2
Zhang S.
Zakharova A.
6-46-1
Erjavec V.
Maria T.[3]
6-46-776-2
Li A.[2]
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-47-64
Seidel E.
Jeanjean L.
6-26-2
Cocciaretto E.
Parry D.
6-46-776-2
Liu C.
Eala A.[4]
2-66-46-4
Osorio C.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-2
Mcnally C.
Juvan K.
6-31-66-3
Tomljanovic A.
Parks A.[5]
7-57-5
Putintseva Y.[6]
Korneeva A.
7-624-66-4
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Kudermetova P.[8]
1-66-16-2
Wang X.
Jones F.[7]
6-46-4