Justin Engel vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Hamburg CH Round of 16

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER4
Justin Engel
#279ATP
1411ELO
1411Hard ELO
$76kYTD
$528kCAREER
18 yrs · 185 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#342ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Engel J.
2-6 6-3 7-6
Stebe C.
Engel J.
26772
Stebe C.
63631

Justin Engel defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 2-6 6-3 7-6 in the Hamburg CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Engel J.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Engel J.

Serve advantage — Stebe C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Engel J.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Engel J.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
38
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
75
Break points won·Even
10
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
48
87
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
53
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Engel J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Stebe C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8Hard Elo 1411
Surface ELO
6.2+113 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1411
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1556
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Engel J.[4]
Cina F.[6]
7-57-64
Semi-finals
Engel J.[4]
Moro Canas A.[7]
7-636-4
Cina F.[6]
Loffhagen G.[5]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Moro Canas A.[7]
Gadamauri B.
1-66-37-5
Engel J.[4]
Dodig M.[8]
4-67-647-65
Loffhagen G.[5]
Squire H.
6-47-65
Cina F.[6]
Gentzsch T.
6-26-2
R16
Gentzsch T.
Rodesch C.[2]
5-73-1
Gadamauri B.
Geerts M.
7-56-3
Moro Canas A.[7]
Erhard M.
7-646-4
Engel J.[4]
Stebe C.
2-66-37-63
Dodig M.[8]
Mackenzie J.
6-16-756-3
Squire H.
Martineau M.
7-626-4
Loffhagen G.[5]
Glinka D.
W/O
Cina F.[6]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-1
R32
Moro Canas A.[7]
Opitz J.
4-67-636-2
Stebe C.
Mcdonald N.
6-46-4
Dodig M.[8]
Coulibaly E.
6-46-3
Loffhagen G.[5]
Topo M.
6-7107-56-1
Glinka D.
Vives Marcos P.
6-46-1
Martineau M.
Moeller M.
6-36-1
Cina F.[6]
Karol M.
7-655-76-4
Rodesch C.[2]
Mrva M.
4-67-636-4
Squire H.
Onclin G.[3]
6-46-0
Geerts M.
Merida Aguilar D.[1]
7-52-67-63
Erhard M.
Negritu C.
6-46-2
Mackenzie J.
Forti F.
6-26-3
Kuzmanov D.
Petkovic M.
2-66-26-4
Gentzsch T.
Brunclik P.
6-16-2
Gadamauri B.
Andreev A.
6-36-4
Engel J.[4]
Jong S.
7-647-610