Justin Engel vs Sander Jong — Hamburg CH Round of 32

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER4
Justin Engel
#280ATP
1411ELO
1411Hard ELO
$76kYTD
$528kCAREER
18 yrs · 185 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
NED
Sander Jong
#730ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWLW
Engel J.
7-6 7-6
Jong S.
Engel J.
777122
Jong S.
646100

Justin Engel defeated Sander Jong 7-6 7-6 in the Hamburg CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Engel J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jong S.

Jong S.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Engel J.

Serve advantage — Jong S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Engel J.Jong S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
69%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
42%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
9.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 5). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Engel J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jong S.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 826 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Engel J.Jong S.
Freshness·
—
76

Jong S.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Engel J.[4]
Cina F.[6]
7-57-64
Semi-finals
Engel J.[4]
Moro Canas A.[7]
7-636-4
Cina F.[6]
Loffhagen G.[5]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Moro Canas A.[7]
Gadamauri B.
1-66-37-5
Engel J.[4]
Dodig M.[8]
4-67-647-65
Loffhagen G.[5]
Squire H.
6-47-65
Cina F.[6]
Gentzsch T.
6-26-2
R16
Gentzsch T.
Rodesch C.[2]
5-73-1
Gadamauri B.
Geerts M.
7-56-3
Moro Canas A.[7]
Erhard M.
7-646-4
Engel J.[4]
Stebe C.
2-66-37-63
Dodig M.[8]
Mackenzie J.
6-16-756-3
Squire H.
Martineau M.
7-626-4
Loffhagen G.[5]
Glinka D.
W/O
Cina F.[6]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-1
R32
Moro Canas A.[7]
Opitz J.
4-67-636-2
Stebe C.
Mcdonald N.
6-46-4
Dodig M.[8]
Coulibaly E.
6-46-3
Loffhagen G.[5]
Topo M.
6-7107-56-1
Glinka D.
Vives Marcos P.
6-46-1
Martineau M.
Moeller M.
6-36-1
Cina F.[6]
Karol M.
7-655-76-4
Rodesch C.[2]
Mrva M.
4-67-636-4
Squire H.
Onclin G.[3]
6-46-0
Geerts M.
Merida Aguilar D.[1]
7-52-67-63
Erhard M.
Negritu C.
6-46-2
Mackenzie J.
Forti F.
6-26-3
Kuzmanov D.
Petkovic M.
2-66-26-4
Gentzsch T.
Brunclik P.
6-16-2
Gadamauri B.
Andreev A.
6-36-4
Engel J.[4]
Jong S.
7-647-610