Andres Martin vs Liam Draxl — Sioux Falls CH Round of 16

Sioux Falls CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Andres Martin
USA
Andres Martin
1337ELO
1332Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
Liam Draxl
CAN4
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Martin A.
6-1 7-5
Draxl L.
Martin A.
672
Draxl L.
150

Andres Martin defeated Liam Draxl 6-1 7-5 in the Sioux Falls CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Liam Draxl came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Andres Martin claimed a first win over Liam Draxl in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Andres Martin came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-07Cincinnati MastersQ1hardLiam Draxl6-3 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Martin A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Draxl L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martin A.Draxl L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Martin A.Draxl L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
60
83
Break points won·Clear edge
14
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
51
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
33
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin A.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Draxl L.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
2.2Hard Elo 1332
Surface ELO
7.8+233 Hard Elo edge
2.0Overall Elo 1337
ELO gap
8.0Overall Elo 1592
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.2
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martin A.Draxl L.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
98

Martin A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Draxl L.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Monday J.
6-727-647-5
Semi-finals
Monday J.
Rosenkranz M.
6-47-64
Kypson P.[5]
Ghibaudo A.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Rosenkranz M.
Thompson J.[1]
7-51-0
Kypson P.[5]
Hijikata R.[3]
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-646-4
Monday J.
Martin A.
6-36-3
R16
Martin A.
Draxl L.[4]
6-17-5
Monday J.
Perez A.
7-56-3
Thompson J.[1]
Arutiunian E.
7-57-62
Rosenkranz M.
Cassone M.[6]
6-07-5
Kypson P.[5]
Jodar R.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Ilagan A.
7-627-5
Hijikata R.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-636-2
Ghibaudo A.
Fenty A.
7-56-4
R32
Ilagan A.
Holt B.[2]
4-3
Thompson J.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Boulais J.
6-16-4
Cassone M.[6]
Krueger M.
7-653-66-2
Draxl L.[4]
Blanch D.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Monday J.
Zheng M.[7]
2-66-46-4
Kypson P.[5]
Tarvet O.
6-24-66-3
Jodar R.
Purtseladze S.
6-47-5
Banerjee S.
Mchugh A.
6-36-4
Arutiunian E.
Zahraj P.
6-16-2
Fenty A.
Smith K.
4-67-647-63
Ghibaudo A.
Clarke J.[8]
2-66-27-5
Damm M.
Martin D.
6-26-4
Hijikata R.[3]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-0
Martin A.
Shah A.
7-651-66-3