Martin Damm vs Andre Ilagan — Sioux Falls CH Round of 16

Sioux Falls CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
USA
Andre Ilagan
#263ATP
1543ELO
1518Hard ELO
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWW
Damm M.
7-6 7-5
Ilagan A.
Damm M.
7772
Ilagan A.
6250

Martin Damm defeated Andre Ilagan 7-6 7-5 in the Sioux Falls CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #106, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ilagan A.

Ilagan A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Ilagan A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
80%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
40%
Break points saved·Even
65%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.9
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Ilagan A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
76
Break points won·Clear edge
1
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Ilagan A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+138 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1518
8.0Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1543
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.7
Surface form
7.3
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.8
Minutes 14d
1.2
0.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Ilagan A.
Freshness·Dominant
89
58

Damm M.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Ilagan A.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 99 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Monday J.
6-727-647-5
Semi-finals
Monday J.
Rosenkranz M.
6-47-64
Kypson P.[5]
Ghibaudo A.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Rosenkranz M.
Thompson J.[1]
7-51-0
Kypson P.[5]
Hijikata R.[3]
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-646-4
Monday J.
Martin A.
6-36-3
R16
Martin A.
Draxl L.[4]
6-17-5
Monday J.
Perez A.
7-56-3
Thompson J.[1]
Arutiunian E.
7-57-62
Rosenkranz M.
Cassone M.[6]
6-07-5
Kypson P.[5]
Jodar R.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Ilagan A.
7-627-5
Hijikata R.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-636-2
Ghibaudo A.
Fenty A.
7-56-4
R32
Ilagan A.
Holt B.[2]
4-3
Thompson J.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Boulais J.
6-16-4
Cassone M.[6]
Krueger M.
7-653-66-2
Draxl L.[4]
Blanch D.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Monday J.
Zheng M.[7]
2-66-46-4
Kypson P.[5]
Tarvet O.
6-24-66-3
Jodar R.
Purtseladze S.
6-47-5
Banerjee S.
Mchugh A.
6-36-4
Arutiunian E.
Zahraj P.
6-16-2
Fenty A.
Smith K.
4-67-647-63
Ghibaudo A.
Clarke J.[8]
2-66-27-5
Damm M.
Martin D.
6-26-4
Hijikata R.[3]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-0
Martin A.
Shah A.
7-651-66-3